[PC-NCSG] CCT

[Edward Morris]

Hi everybody,
  
 Sorry to bother you again.
  
 The BC has decided to go around the approved process and get yet another 
commercial representative appointed to the CCT, citing gender diversity. 
Their letter requesting special consideration is attached.
  
 NCSG member Stacie Walsh was also nominated by two GNSO parties.
  
 Frankly, I'm philosophically opposed to attempts to subvert the process 
that this letter typifies. That said, I'm mindful of our responsibility to 
aggressively represent our members.
  
 Should we send  a similar letter citing both gender diversity and the lack 
of ideological diversity on the CCT; i.e. we agree with the BC on the lack 
of gender diversity but believe Stacie is the stronger candidate based upon 
the underrepresentation both of the noncommercial community and the lack of 
age diversity of selectees.
  
 I'm not sure who should approve /. disapprove this idea is  it the EC or 
PC?) but do think we need to consider it. We are seriously underrepresented 
on the CCT, more so of this BC ploy is successful.
  
 Best,
  
 Ed
  
  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160115/5af3189c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bc-cct-to-chehade-schneider-11jan16-en.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 211440 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160115/5af3189c/attachment-0001.obj>