[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I participated in this group.  I feel good about it.  We are doing more
and more work that crosses the boundaries and are not just about gTLDs.
I believe that breaking down the silos on non gTLD work is a good thing.

I believe in having a strong and relevant GNSO, but do believe it should
remain within its mission.

avri


On 25-Feb-16 18:29, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> How do we feel about this, folks?  I am concerned about the ongoing
> relevance of the GNSO.....just wondering. 
> cheers steph
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment
> Date: 	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:44:46 +0000
> From: 	Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>
> To: 	Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>,
> cwg-stewardship at icann.org <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>, Accountability
> Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> CC: 	Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Thanks for flagging this Grace.  I note that there is a session in
> Marrakech on this:  ?Non-PDP CCWG Principles Cross Community Working
> Group  10:45 am - 12 pm UTC?.   I fully agree with Grace that those of
> us in the  CWG Stewardship (as well as those in the CCWG
> Accountability) should be very well qualified to provided relevant
> input into the proposed framework for cross community working groups. 
> I am not a member of the cross community WG that prepared the
> framework, but I have tracked their work over the last couple years
> and plan to attend the session in Marrakech.
>
>  
>
> Chuck
>
>  
>
> *From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:15 PM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org; Accountability Cross Community
> *Cc:* Mary Wong
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment
>
>  
>
> Dear CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability members, participants,
> and observers,
>
>  
>
> I?m writing to request your expert feedback for the public comment on
> the draft framework principles for cross community working
> groups: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-framework-principles-draft-2016-02-22-en.
> I?ve attached the draft to the email for your convenience. 
>
>  
>
> */Why you?/*
>
> You are the experts. You are the past, the present, and the future of
> cross community working groups at ICANN. You have survived one (or
> both) of the big IANA Stewardship Transition working groups over the
> past two years, and you probably (I hope!) have a lot to reflect upon
> and share. 
>
>  
>
> */What?s the point?/*
>
> There are no agreed community-wide guidelines on the use of CCWGs, but
> they are such an _awesome_ form of multistakeholder policymaking that
> the ICANN community is increasingly reliant on CCWGs for their policy
> efforts. The CCWG-Principles has taken on the task of developing a
> uniform framework of principles intended to guide the formation,
> initiation, operations and closure of future CCWGs. 
>
>
>
> */How much time do I have?/*
>
> The public comment period opened on Monday this week. You have 39 days
> left, until *23 April at 23:59 UTC*. You could jot down some thoughts
> during your long plane rides to/from Marrakech, or even as you observe
> the action during the sessions! 
>
>  
>
> The email to which your comments may be sent is:
> <comments-ccwg-framework-principles-22feb16 at icann.org>. If you have
> any questions, please contact Mary Wong (cc?ed here). 
>
>  
>
> I am passionate about this work because we?ve innovated and learned so
> much from the IANA Stewardship Transition working groups, and I have
> had the privilege and opportunity to work with both groups from their
> formation. I am keen to see where the outcome of this public comment
> period takes us next, and I very much hope that you will take pride in
> designing that path forward. 
>
>  
>
> ?Grace
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus