[PC-NCSG] public comment to draft PTI FY18 operating plan and budget

[Marilia Maciel]

Dear all,

Since there are still doubts pending on some points of this particular
comment I would like to ask us to discuss this further before we present PC
endorsement to the comment drafted by Stefania and Ed. We do have a little
time (staff report is due on jan 23) but not much.

All the best,
Marilia

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> yes indeed, good idea.
>
> steph
>
> On 2016-12-14 10:03, Milan, Stefania wrote:
>
> ps as i put on the chatroom yesterday at the policy call, the process for the PTI FY18 budget is expected to include "calls with the community" (see below). so it would be good to get some discussion going and come to a joint position for that call, beyond mine and Ed's.
>
> from https://www.icann.org/public-comments/fy18-pti-operating-plan-budget-2016-10-24-en
> "Following the end of this public comment proceeding, we will hold calls with the community. These calls are an opportunity for the community to present their written comments on the Draft PTI FY18 Operating Plan and Budget. This process is intended to enhance understanding of the comments and to improve the quality of the response. All calls will be public, focused on the organization that submitted comments, and attended by at least one PTI Board member. Additional PTI and ICANN Board members may attend based on availability."
>
> ________________________________________
> Da: PC-NCSG <pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org> <pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org> per conto di Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> <aelsadr at egyptig.org>
> Inviato: mercoled? 14 dicembre 2016 15.47.48
> A: Marilia Maciel
> Cc: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
> Oggetto: Re: [PC-NCSG] public comment to draft PTI FY18 operating plan and      budget
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at GMAIL.COM> <mariliamaciel at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> Hi Amr,
>
> We are presenting our endorsement a posteriori, so, in my view, although we should manifest as soon as possible, we do not have a hard deadline. I would not want to preclude discussions, so if Stefania or Ed can jump in and address your comments and doubts, that would be great. In any case, we seem to roughly have enough support to add our PC endorsement by tomorrow, unless there are last minute clear objections.
>
> Yes. I agree with this assessment.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Amr
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>


-- 

*Mar?lia Maciel*
Digital Policy Senior Researcher, DiploFoundation

WMO Building *|* 7bis, Avenue de la Paix *| *1211 Geneva - Switzerland
*Tel *+41 (0) 22 9073632 *| *
*Email*: *MariliaM at diplomacy.edu <mariliam at diplomacy.edu>* *|** Twitter: *
*@MariliaM*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20161215/4323e96d/attachment-0001.html>