[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG
matthew shears
mshears
Thu Dec 15 02:56:19 EET 2016
Personally we should not encourage that this be limited. Anyone should
drop OCL a note expressing interest.
On 14/12/2016 12:24, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
>
> Need an alternative suggestion pretty fast....
> SP
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT -
> Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering
> Organization for CCWG-IG
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:13:05 +0000
> From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
> To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>, farzaneh badii
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>
>
>
> I think we should just do this, and I hope that Olivier and Nigel are
> joining, as well... but also gathering inputs and participants from
> all of the GNSO constituencies. .
>
>
> Yes, we need some geo diversity. Perhaps Jimson/BC - Africa ICT
> Alliance, and some others from non WEOG can contribute. Someone from
> ISPs? Someone from each other Constituency?
>
>
> Are we inviting others from other SGs or ACs, or first drafting as
> GNSO? Sorry to ask but I can also reach out to CCTLDS and GAC if you
> are seeking broader drafting partners in this but I thought it was
> first GNSO?
>
> M
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
> <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Greg Shatan
> <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:53 AM
> *To:* farzaneh badii
> *Cc:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT -
> Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering
> Organization for CCWG-IG
> I suggest we assemble a (Re-)Drafting Team and get on with it.
>
> Marilyn has volunteered.
> It might be a fair assumption that Keith and Farzi have "volunteered"
> as well, by replying to this email. (Which probably means I have
> volunteered too).
> Whether or not that's a fair assumption, I think we need some non-GNSO
> participation in the drafting team to round things out (Marilyn,
> Keith, Farzi and I are all similarly afflicted, though with different
> strains of the GNSO virus). A preponderance of GNSO folk is fine
> (especially since the GNSO is the "inspiration" for this project), but
> we should be somewhat more diverse than that.... (Farzi no longer
> even gives us geographic diversity, since she's now a North American
> Georgia Peach, or Georgia Tech Yellow Jacket, or something like that...)
>
> Let's not wait until the meeting next week to get this going. Wouldn't
> it be nice to have a progress report at next week's meeting instead?
>
> Any other volunteers?
>
> Anyone volunteering to chair? (Not I, with apologies, I'm chaired-out
> at the moment.)
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:15 AM, farzaneh badii
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Keith for bringing this up again. I think we need to start
> doing something about it and we have to start soon.
>
> On 14 December 2016 at 11:10, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com
> <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a plan to get this process started? Copenhagen will
> be here before we know it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Keith
>
> Keith Drazek
>
> Vice President
>
> Public Policy & Government Relations
>
> Verisign, Inc.
>
> +1-571-377-9182 <tel:+1%20571-377-9182>
>
> kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>
>
> *From:*ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 4:10 AM
> *To:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT
> - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a
> Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> GNSO council just approved unanimously this motion. It is
> still chartering organization but we got work to do by
> Copenhagen meeting.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
> ---
> >
> > 2. MOTION ? Conditional participation of the GNSO as
> a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working
> Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting
> ICANN
> >
> > Made by: Darcy Southwell
> >
> > Seconded by:
> >
> >
> >
> > WHEREAS:
> >
> > a) The GNSO Council adopted the charter for a Cross
> Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance
> (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN and make recommendations to
> the chartering organization on these issues on 15 October
> 2014, and as such became a Chartering Organization.
> >
> > b) The Charter foresees that ?At each ICANN Annual
> General Meeting, starting 2014, the Charter and deliverables
> of the WG shall be reviewed by the participating SO?s and AC?s
> to determine whether the WG should continue, or, close and be
> dissolved. Consistent with ICANN community practices, the WG
> will continue if at least two of the participating SO?s or
> AC?s extend the Charter of the WG and notify the other
> participating SO?s and AC?s accordingly one month after the
> annual review date?.
> >
> > c) The CWG-IG provided its first written status update
> on 23 June 2016 (see
> https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf>).
> >
> > d) The GNSO Council recently adopted the ?Uniform
> Framework of Principles and Recommendations for Cross
> Community Working Groups? (CWG Framework) which details the
> lifecycle of a CCWG including initiation, formation,
> operation, decision-making, adoption of Final Report by
> Chartering Organizations and closure of CCWG, and post-closure
> of CCWG.
> >
> > e) The GNSO Council has observed that the CWG-IG does
> not follow this lifecycle, nor has it established or adopted
> an initial work plan and associated schedule as foreseen in
> its Charter.
> >
> > f) The GNSO Council recognizes the importance of a
> continued dialogue and discussion in relation to the topic of
> Internet Governance within an ICANN context.
> >
> > g) The GNSO Council has shared its concerns with the
> ccNSO Council and representatives of other SO/ACs on the
> subject of this CWG and its future.
> >
> >
> >
> > RESOLVED:
> >
> > a) The GNSO Council will continue to participate as a
> Chartering Organization for the CWG-IG. However, this
> participation is conditioned upon a comprehensive review of
> the CWG-IG Charter by the CWG-IG, in accordance with the CWG
> Framework
> (http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf>).
> In particular, the GNSO Council expects future work to be
> subject to a clear work plan, with regular updates and clear
> deliverables.
> >
> > b) The GNSO Council expects that the CWG-IG will
> present by ICANN58 a report on its findings, which may include
> a revised charter or a recommendation to reconstitute the
> group under a new structure.
> >
> > c) Following the submission of the CWG-IG report, the
> GNSO Council will consider the recommendations and decide
> whether or not it will continue as a Chartering Organization.
> >
> > d) The GNSO Secretariat will communicate this decision
> to the CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering
> Organizations.
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
--
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20161214/85eb988b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list