[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [council] Reminder - each SG to identify one member for new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG

[Tapani Tarvainen]

All,

Even with the deadline extension we're running out of time here,
so let's try to move forward with this.

I agree with Ed's observation that we have several good candidates,
and after thinking about it I find the argument about a councillor
being good for the position to be persuasive.

So I second his endorsement of Stephanie, and ask all PC members to
express their position as soon as possible, whether +1 or -1 or
endorsement of someone else.

Tapani

On Dec 06 14:33, Edward Morris (egmorris1 at toast.net) wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> As indicated below RySG has appointed Jon Nevett from Donuts to the Auction Proceeds CCWG.
> 
> We have a number of highly qualified and motivated volunteers for our appointment to this CCWG. I hope ALL will participate in the proceedings. We need as many volunteers there as are able to donate their time and talents.
> 
> In differentiating between our highly qualified volunteers I note that one volunteer brings something to the position no one else does: a seat on the GNSO Council. As the principle difference between a Member and a Participant is the reporting obligation to the NCSG of the Member,  I do see the added value of having that individual also being a Member of Council so if there are any shenanigans going on she not only can report that back to us but also can directly pursue that issue on Council.
> 
> As such I support Stephanie Perrin for the position. Not only does Stephanie have the position on Council but she has the experience and savvy to go toe to toe with Donuts in areas of disagreement. She also has shown that once she accepts a position she will show up- something we had problems with with the appointees to the group that drafted this Charter. We can count on Stephanie to be there.
> 
> I would ask, though, that all volunteers are asked to join the group as participants. As the CCWG - Accountability demonstrates on most issues there is little difference between Members and Volunteers and numbers to count. We need folks there.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ed Morris
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br>
> > Date: 6 December 2016 at 13:15:47 GMT
> > To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> > Cc: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz at pir.org>, Jon Nevett <jon at donuts.email>, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> > Subject: Re: [council] Reminder - each SG to identify one member for new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
> > 
> > 
> > Marika,
> > 
> > Since Jonathan Robinson seems to run unopposed to be CCWG GNSO Co-Chair and will need to bring his well-known capabilities on behalf of the full GNSO community, the RySG appoints Jon Nevett to be a member of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG. 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rubens
> > 
> > 
> >> On Nov 30, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Dear All,
> >>  
> >> As a reminder, please note that each Stakeholder Group has been requested to identify one (1) member for the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG by 5 December. Per the charter, best efforts should be made to ensure that members:
> >>  
> >> Have sufficient and appropriate motivation (and ideally expertise) to participate in the substance of the work of the CCWG. Appropriate experience could, for example, include experience with allocation and final disbursement of funds;
> >> Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CCWG on an on-going and long-term basis;
> >> Solicit and communicate (where appropriate) the views and concerns of individuals in the organization that appoints them;
> >> Commit to abide to the charter when participating in the CCWG;
> >> Understand the needs of the Internet communities that ICANN serves (standards, domains and numbers);
> >> Understand the broader ecosystem (the Internet Community) in which ICANN operates and the needs of those working on other aspects of the Internet industry, including those not yet connected.
> >>  
> >> The Charter furthermore notes in relation to Chartering Organization appointed members that:
> >>  
> >> In addition to the role that Chartering Organization appointed members have in relation to potential consensus calls or decisions (see below), they are expected to serve as a liaison between their respective Chartering Organization and the CCWG. Members must, if and when necessary, ensure that the Chartering Organizations are kept up to date on the progress and deliberations of the CCWG as well as sharing any input from the Chartering Organization with the CCWG.
> >>  
> >> Chartering Organizations are encouraged as part of the CCWG member selection process, to take into account how appointed members can better contribute from a diversity of viewpoints. This can be achieved by looking at the cultural, geographic, industry, knowledge and expertise diversity as well as gender balance of Chartering Organizations appointed members.
> >>  
> >> Chartering Organizations are encouraged to use open and inclusive processes when selecting their members for a CCWG and this should include reasonable efforts to ensure that each of ICANN?s five regions is represented.
> >>  
> >> As noted in the resolution from ICANN57, ?The GNSO Council expects to select a GNSO Co-Chair for the CCWG from the slate of GNSO appointed members to the CCWG during its meeting on 15 December 2016?.
> >>  
> >> Best regards,
> >>  
> >> Marika
> >>  
> >> Marika Konings
> >> Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
> >> Email: marika.konings at icann.org  
> >>  
> >> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
> >> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. 
> >>  
> >