[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [council] Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working Group

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin
Tue Aug 23 00:47:03 EEST 2016 

I did.  Day after deadline...

Stephanie


On 2016-08-22 17:14, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to raise this here. I don?t recall that we?ve dealt with 
> this in the PC capacity. I don?t know who?s signed up for this, but 
> the NCSG PC needs to appoint a primary and alternate member to this WG.
>
> I?ll try to find out who signed up from NCSG.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From: *Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org 
>> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
>> *Subject: **[council] Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working Group*
>> *Date: *July 27, 2016 at 9:42:22 AM GMT+2
>> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>" 
>> <council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
>> *Cc: *"gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>" 
>> <gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
>>
>> *
>> Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working Group*
>> **
>> */In Brief/*
>>
>> The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council adopted 
>> theCharter 
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>of 
>> the GNSO Review Working Group during its meeting on 21 July 2016. 
>> This Working Group is tasked to develop an implementation plan for 
>> theGNSO Review recommendations 
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>which 
>> were recentlyadopted 
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-06-25-en#2.e>by 
>> the ICANN Board. This is the Call for Volunteers to join this Working 
>> Group. Anyone interested in the GNSO Review and contributing to the 
>> development of the implementation plan and subsequent implementation 
>> is encouraged to volunteer.
>> **
>> */What This Working Group Will Do/*
>> **
>> Per the GNSO Review Working GroupCharter 
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>the 
>> GNSO Review Working Group will be responsible for developing an 
>> implementation plan, containing a realistic timeline for the 
>> implementation, definition of desired outcomes and a way to measure 
>> current state as well as progress toward the desired outcome for the 
>> GNSO Review recommendations adopted by the ICANN Board (thirty-four 
>> (34) recommendations of theFinal Report 
>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>of 
>> the Independent Examiner (i.e. all recommendations excluding 
>> recommendations 23 and 32). This implementation plan is to be 
>> submitted for approval to the GNSO Council, followed by consideration 
>> by the ICANN Board. Following the approval of the implementation 
>> plan, the Working Group is also expected to execute and oversee the 
>> implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations unless specified 
>> differently in the implementation plan.
>>
>> The GNSO Review Working Group will also be responsible for 
>> considering any new requests^^[1] <x-msg://16/#_ftn1>by the GNSO 
>> Council concerning issues related to the GNSO Council processes and 
>> procedures and to Working Group guidelines that have been identified 
>> either by the GNSO Council, or a group chartered by the GNSO Council, 
>> as needing discussion. However, the first priority of the Working 
>> Group will be the development of an implementation plan and the 
>> subsequent implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations.
>>
>> *Timeline and Deliverables*
>>
>> The GNSO Review Working Group is expected to deliver the 
>> implementation plan to the GNSO Council for consideration at the GNSO 
>> Council meeting at ICANN57 at the latest in order to meet the Board 
>> set objective of ?an implementation plan, containing a realistic 
>> timeline for the implementation, definition of desired outcomes and a 
>> way to measure current state as well as progress toward the desired 
>> outcome, shall be submitted to the Board as soon as possible, but no 
>> later than six (6) months after the adoption of this resolution?^^[2] 
>> <x-msg://16/#_ftn2>i.e., December 2016.
>>
>> */How to Join/*
>> Each GNSO Stakeholder Group and/or Constituency will identify one 
>> primary and one alternate member to serve on the GNSO Review Working 
>> Group. In addition to these appointed members, anyone interested will 
>> be able to join this working group as a participant or observer. 
>> Please note that participants are expected to attend conference calls 
>> and to actively participate in online discussions.  They also must 
>> submit a Statement of Interest per Section 5.0 of theGNSO Operating 
>> Procedures 
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-16feb16-en.pdf>.  
>> Observers can follow the group's work on the mailing list but can 
>> neither send to the mailing list nor participate actively in the calls.
>> Interested participants and observers are requested to complete 
>> thesign-up sheet <https://goo.gl/forms/TbmkrEXT2xlx6jGn1>by Friday, 
>> 19 August 2016.
>>
>> */Next steps/***
>>
>> It is anticipated that the GNSO Review Working Group will convene 
>> online for the first time in the last week of August 2016. Following 
>> that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with 
>> the Working Group?s work plan, which it is expected to develop as one 
>> of its first tasks.
>> *//*
>> */Further information and preparation/***
>>
>> For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are 
>> encouraged to review the following materials:
>> 1.GNSO Review Recommendations 
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>
>> 2.Independent Examiner Final 
>> Report<https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>
>> 3.Frequently Asked Questions<https://community.icann.org/x/UBCbAw>
>> */Background/***
>>
>> The second independent review of the GNSO commenced in 2014.  The 
>> Final Report of the independent examiner was published on 15 
>> September 2015 
>> (seehttps://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf) 
>> and contained 36 recommendations in the areas of: participation & 
>> representation, continuous development, transparency and alignment 
>> with ICANN's future.  The GNSO Council adopted the GNSO Review 
>> Recommendations Feasibility and Prioritization analysis 
>> (see:http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf) 
>> on 14 April 2016 with the modification of Recommendation 21, that the 
>> council recommends staff working with the GNSO to institute methods 
>> of information sharing of highly relevant research related to gTLDs 
>> to help the GNSO community members increase their knowledge base (low 
>> priority).
>> On 25 June, the ICANN Board accepted the Final Report from the 
>> independent examiner, taking into account the GNSO Working Party's 
>> Feasibility and Prioritization Analysis of the GNSO Review 
>> Recommendations, adopted with modifications by the GNSO Council.  The 
>> Board adopted thirty-four (34) recommendations of the Final Report 
>> (i.e. all recommendations excluding recommendations 23 and 32).  
>> Furthermore, the Board requested that the GNSO Council convene a 
>> group that oversees the implementation of Board-accepted recommendations.
>> Per themotion <https://community.icann.org/x/BAObAw>adopted on 21 
>> July 2016, the GNSO Council adopted theCharter 
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>of 
>> the GNSO Review Working Group and directed staff to send a Call for 
>> Volunteers for the Working Group.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [1] <x-msg://16/#_ftnref1>For items that are submitted for review 'on 
>> request', the GNSO Review WG expects to receive detailed input from 
>> the group affected by theprocess/operational change concerned. See 
>> request template 
>> at:https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/14713135/GNSO-SCI-ReviewRequest-yyymmdd_template.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1469143165000&api=v2.
>> [2] <x-msg://16/#_ftnref2>The Board resolution was adopted on 25 June 
>> 2016
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160822/c3a83ca1/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list