[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FINAL DEADLINE FOR CC1 COMMENTS IS TODAY

[avri doria]

Hi,


I have snt several notifications of this review to the NCSG PC.  Think I
also sent some to the Discuss list.  As one of the co-chairs of the PDP
WG, I am pretty much convinced we don't really care about any of the
questions.


questions cover

- should there be more gtlds application opportunities
- should there be categories which are treated differently in the
application process
- should we keep working with rounds of go for a fcfs procedure or
something else?  currently we use the trial by ordeal method, though we
call it a round.
- how do we balance predictability and flexibility.  Is one more
important that the other
- how muc community engagement in the application process should there
be.  What sort?
- should there be limits on the number of gtlds in a procedure or for
one applicant.

As I say I have never noticed great caring about new gTLDs in the NCSG
except on some spot issues - like open vs closed, geo names for gac
&cctlds, property rights (being covered in the RPM groups), communities

And where we may care, like communities, we probably have a split opinions.

avri


On 19-Aug-16 11:59, Robin Gross wrote:
> I don?t recall if NCSG received this request for comment from the new
> gtld working group.  Is this something on the NCSG PC?s agenda?  It
> looks like it might be too late after today, although we could
> probably ask for an extension today if folks wanted to comment in the
> next couple of days.  I haven?t been following this issue closely
> enough to provide much further background on the questionnaire
> however.  Just wanted to bring it to the attention of the PC.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From: *Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
>> <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>>
>> *Date: *August 19, 2016 at 7:22:21 AM PDT
>> *To: *"gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>"
>> <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>>
>> *Subject: **[Gnso-newgtld-wg] FINAL DEADLINE FOR CC1 COMMENTS IS TODAY*
>>
>> All,
>>  
>> Just a reminder that today is the deadline to receive input from the
>> cc1 questionnaire that was sent out on June 9^th  (71 DAYS AGO).  To
>> date I believe we have only received responses from  the ccNSO, GAC
>> and RySG.  Nothing from the ALAC, RrSG, IPC, BC, ISPC, NCUC, etc.  If
>> responses are not submitted today, we will assume that those groups
>> will not be responding and we will base our CC1 findings on the
>> discussions of the group and the statements we have received thus far.
>>
>> Thanks. 
>>  
>> *Jeffrey J. Neuman*
>> *Senior Vice President *|*Valideus USA** *| *Com Laude USA*
>> 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
>> Mclean, VA 22102, United States
>> E: _jeff.neuman at valideus.com
>> <mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com>_ or _jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
>> <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>_
>> T: +1.703.635.7514
>> M: +1.202.549.5079
>> @Jintlaw
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus