[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [council] FW: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council

[Edward Morris]

I am in total agreement with Avri on this matter. Not much else I can add. She has concisely said it all.

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

> On 11 Aug 2016, at 04:24, avri doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> - Rushing the gTLD SubPro group is not going to make it go faster.
> 
> And the Council ought not try to decide to go with new rounds before the
> process is completed.
> 
> Registries are pushing for new rounds as soon as possible, but we really
> ought to work though the process.
> 
> 
> avri
> 
>> On 10-Aug-16 22:38, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> 
>> fyi, pleased to reflect any views back to James on this matter.
>> 
>> Steph
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject:    [council] FW: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to
>> James Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council
>> Date:    Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:13:02 +0000
>> From:    James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
>> To:    GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Microsoft Word - 2016-08-05-Steve-Crocker-to-James-Bladel.docx
>> Councilors -
>> 
>> Attached, please find a letter form Steve Crocker/ICANN Board to the
>> Council, regarding the work on subsequent rounds of New gTLDs.   (Per
>> Wendy?s note, the letter has not yet been posted on the ICANN
>> Correspondence page, but expected soon). 
>> 
>> Note that the letter contains a specific request to the GNSO:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> /?For example, assuming all other review activities are completed, it
>> would be helpful to understand whether the GNSO believes that the
>> entirety of the current Subsequent Procedures PDP must be completed
>> prior to advancing a new application process under the current policy
>> recommendations. The Board is cognizant that it may be difficult to
>> provide a firm answer at this stage of the process as the reviews are
>> still underway and the PDP is in its initial stages of work, but if
>> any consideration has been given in relation to whether a future
>> application process could proceed while policy work continues and be
>> iteratively applied to the process for allocating new gTLDs, or that a
>> set of critical issues could be identified to be addressed prior to a
>> new application process, the Board would welcome that input./
>> 
>> /The Board would also welcome any elaboration on the expected time
>> frame outlined in the PDP Work Plan, as well as any additional points
>> the GNSO might wish to clarify for the Board in its efforts to support
>> the various areas of work underway in the multistakeholder community?./
>> 
>> I propose that we add this question/topic, and the letter itself, to
>> our 1 SEP meeting agenda as a discussion item, and that we examine
>> ideas on how to proceed on responding to this question. If this is
>> amenable, I would also ask Staff to draft a brief note to Steve,
>> acknowledging the receipt of this letter and noting that it would be
>> discussed during our next meeting.
>> 
>> Thoughts on this approach?
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> J.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Wendy Profit <wendy.profit at icann.org
>> <mailto:wendy.profit at icann.org>>
>> Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 14:19
>> To: James Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>,
>> Glen de Saint G?ry <gnso-secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-secretariat at gnso.icann.org>>, Marika Konings
>> <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
>> Cc: Steve Crocker <steve.crocker at board.icann.org
>> <mailto:steve.crocker at board.icann.org>>, Icann-board ICANN
>> <icann-board at icann.org <mailto:icann-board at icann.org>>, board-support
>> <board-support at icann.org <mailto:board-support at icann.org>>, Akram
>> Atallah <akram.atallah at icann.org <mailto:akram.atallah at icann.org>>,
>> Erika Randall <erika.randall at icann.org
>> <mailto:erika.randall at icann.org>>, Daniel Halloran
>> <daniel.halloran at icann.org <mailto:daniel.halloran at icann.org>>, Eleeza
>> Agopian <eleeza.agopian at icann.org <mailto:eleeza.agopian at icann.org>>,
>> Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org
>> <mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>>, Karen Lentz <karen.lentz at icann.org
>> <mailto:karen.lentz at icann.org>>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org
>> <mailto:cyrus.namazi at icann.org>>, Cristina Flores
>> <cristina.flores at icann.org <mailto:cristina.flores at icann.org>>
>> Subject: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James Bladel,
>> Chair, GNSO Council
>> 
>> Dear James Bladel,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please find the attached letter from Steve Crocker, Chair, ICANN Board
>> of Directors regarding subsequent New gTLD rounds.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The letter will be posted shortly to the ICANN Correspondence and New
>> gTLD Correspondence pages:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence
>> 
>> https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/correspondence
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> With warm regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Wendy Profit
>> 
>> ICANN Board Operations Specialist
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg