[PC-NCSG] [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: Waiver of 10-Day Motion Deadline and Resubmission of Motions

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:52 AM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I need to give a response on this.
> Anyone suggest that I should object?
> 
> I think it is ok.

So do I. I already OK?ed this on behalf of the NCUC (as I am the NCUC appointee to the SCI).

> 
> thanks
> 
> avri
> 
> PS. Who is going to be the next SCI rep for NCSG.

Would it be OK with you to hold off on your replacement, and pick this up again when the constituencies have had a chance to update their appointees to the NCSG PC? At that point, I believe we should also discuss elections for whoever will chair the PC for the coming year.

Thanks.

Amr

> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: Waiver of 10-Day
> Motion Deadline and Resubmission of Motions
> Date: 	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:40:45 +0000
> From: 	Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> To: 	gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
> 
> 
> 
> Dear SCI members, 
> 
> As discussed during the SCI call last week on 17 September, please see
> below the proposed letter from the SCI to the GNSO Council on the issue
> of the waiver of the 10-day motion deadline and resubmission of motions.
> */
> /*
> */This is a consensus call./*  
> 
> Please indicate your agreement with, or objection to, the proposed
> letter.  */If there are no objections or changes received by /**/_COB
> Tuesday, 29 September 2015_/**/, the letter will be presumed to be
> accepted by full consensus./*
> 
> Kind regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
> ------------------------
> 
> Dear Jonathan,
> 
> 
> 
> On 05 March 2015 the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation
> (SCI) submitted to the GNSO Council a Review Request (see attached) on
> the issue of whether the waiver of the 10-day deadline for the
> submission of motions can be applied to resubmitted motions.  The Review
> Request was one of two that the Council approved at its meeting on 16
> April 2015.  The SCI is continuing to discuss the other Review Request
> from the Council for the SCI to consider codifying the current informal
> procedure for amendments to motions and to recommend any changes SCI
> believes (through full consensus) are appropriate.
> 
> 
> 
> The SCI has determined after a review of the GNSO Operating Procedures
> that by its terms as previously approved by Council, the waiver of the
> 10-day deadline for submission of motions does _not_ apply to
> resubmitted motions. Further, after lengthy discussion of the possible
> issues, the SCI is reluctant to make any recommendations to change the
> current status of the Operating Procedures given that no instance of a
> problem arising in this regard has occurred.   The SCI also notes that
> although changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures are not recommended at
> this time, the SCI could revisit the issue if requested by the Council
> and, specifically, if there is a contentious issue that warrants further
> analysis.
> 
> 
> 
> Please let us know whether you or the Council have any questions or
> require further information concerning the SCI's response to this issue
> request.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Anne and Rudi
> 
> 
> 
> Anne Aikman-Scalese, SCI Chair
> 
> Rudi Vansnick, SCI Vice-Chair
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> <SCI Review Request - Waiver & Resubmission - 5 Mar 2015.pdf>_______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg