[PC-NCSG] [urgent] NCPH candidate nomination

[Edward Morris]

Hi Amr,
  
 Thanks for explaining. I thought you were attacking me as being overly pious, but we obviously read and reacted to the initial post in different ways. The idea either Heather or James would allow themselves to be used in that way...well, we both know they wouldn't. It bugged me just as it would if anyone suggested you or I would let ourselves be used in such a way.
  
 I actually think we're both saying the same thing: these are two good people, let's treat everyone, as you wrote, fairly. I've heard stories about the past but that is the past. I'd trust either Heather or James with my wallet, possessions: good people both, high integrity both.
  
 Sorry if offence was taken and sorry I took offence when none was intended. I will self punish: another 9 or 10 hours on a CCWG call today. 
  
 Berst,
  
 Ed
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 2:10 PM
To: "egmorris1 at toast.net" <egmorris1 at toast.net>
Cc: "<avri at acm.org>" <avri at acm.org>, "<pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>" <pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] [urgent] NCPH candidate nomination   
 Hi Ed,
  
 Wow!! Way to go making this about my ethical code!! I thought the reference to participation in a "bait and switch" scheme was made in association with us and our strategy in the elections, not the candidates.
  
 In case you have any doubts, I am not in favor of such tactics. Apart from being unethical, I believe them to be not constructive. I thought the suggestion was made in jest, anyway. Maybe I'm wrong.
  
 Thanks. 
  
 Amr

Sent from mobile

On Sep 26, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:
 
    
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 1:10 PM
To: "Edward Morris" <egmorris1 at toast.net>
Cc: avri at acm.org, pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] [urgent] NCPH candidate nomination    
   Hi,

I don't believe anyone has even alluded to doubting the ethics of either candidate. Lets not make this thread about something it isn't. 
    
    
    
   Maybe not in your ethical code, Amr, but suggesting either candidate would participate in a "bait and switch" scheme to me is an indication of impure motivation, an ethics problem. I responded suggesting neither Heather nor James would participate in such fraud. I'm sorry you have problems with my response.
    
   Best,
    
   Ed
    


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150926/2a95e9fc/attachment-0001.html>