[PC-NCSG] GNSO council chair election

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Avri,

Thanks, we can plan call with Heather  next week to give her a chance. I
will check about the availability later.
I guess we should also weight all options if any.

Best,

Rafik
On Sep 11, 2015 1:34 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Seems like a decent recommendation.  I recommend a call with Heather.
>
> avri
>
> On 10-Sep-15 21:05, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > as expected CSG approaching us for the GNSO council chair election and
> > they are suggesting to nominate Heather and that we have call with her .
> >
> > quoting his response below:"
> >
> > The CSG Executive Committee  believes Heather Forrest would make an
> > excellent GNSO Council chair.  She offers a unique combination of
> > ICANN experience, enthusiasm, work ethic, deep knowledge and a
> > collegial and open-minded working style that make her an ideal
> > candidate.  We propose that our House put Heather forward as its
> > nominee.
> >
> >
> >
> > As you know, nominations are due September 25.  I encourage you to
> > work with Heather (also copied here) to arrange a teleconference
> > interview with participants from your side of the House in time to
> > reach a decision on our nominee prior to this deadline.  (CSG held a
> > similar interview call with Heather yesterday.)  Please let me know if
> > there is anything I can do to facilitate this.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regarding the vice chair selection process, we are in full agreement
> > with your first condition stated below, that an interview be built
> > into the process.  However, we are not sure what you mean by the
> > second condition, ?If the NCPH will be suggesting both a council
> > vice-chair along  with a potential chair, they should be considered
> > together.?  Since the NCPH role in the two cases is quite different
> > (we nominate a chair candidate that is voted on by all GNSO
> > councilors, while the vice chair is not just nominated but selected by
> > NCPH alone), we are not clear whether you are suggesting that both
> > processes be carried out in tandem, and if so why.  Any clarification
> > you can provide would be welcomed.
> >
> >  "
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150911/24a1d86e/attachment.html>