[PC-NCSG] possible motion - would need to request 10 day waiver.

[Matthew Shears]

Lets consider both texts please - Avri's and James's

On 18/10/2015 17:34, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What do people think about my submitting the following with a request
> for waiver of the 10 day rule?
>
> Whereas
>
> On 13 November 2014 the GNSO approved the charter for *Cross Community
> Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountabilty);
>
> On  ***3 August -** *the Public Comment on the CCWG-Accountability 2nd
> Draft Proposal was initiaited;
>
> *The *CCWG-Accountabilty*  is working in a largely collegial manner to
> achieve a consensus solution to ICANN Accountability;
>
> The *CCWG-Accountabilty* has analyzed the comments received in the
> review of the 2nd draft and is working toward updating its reference
> implementation taking into  the concerns expressed in those comments
> into account
>
> Resolved
>
> The GNSO supports the process that is ongoing in the CCWG-Accountability and
>
> The GNSO re-commits itself to participating in all discussion with an
> open mind to finding the best solution for ICANN
>
> The GNSO re-commits itself to working through the process as agreed upon
> in the charter before making any resolutions declaring support or
> opposition to possible outcomes.
>
>
> avri
>   
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus