[PC-NCSG] Reconsideration

Avri Doria avri
Tue Oct 13 18:20:04 EEST 2015


Hi,

I have no objection as long as it is submitted jointly, with both names
listed.

avri


On 13-Oct-15 07:08, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> less than 3 hours ( to be exact 2h52min) to hear any objection, after
> that Ed can confirm with Phil and Steve, and submit the RR
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-10-13 17:36 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net
> <mailto:egmorris1 at toast.net>>:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     The BC is still evaluating this internally for approval. Once
>     granted, I believe that Steve DelBianco will be listed as the BC
>     requestor.
>
>     Ed
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>     On Oct 13, 2015, at 4:53 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>     Hi Avri,
>>
>>     I think Phil didn't put his name yet but he should do. he only
>>     put his contact info.
>>
>>     Rafik
>>
>>     2015-10-13 4:48 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>     <mailto:avri at acm.org>>:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         Confused, it looks like it is just from Rafik in terms of the
>>         submission.
>>
>>         I thought i twas being submitted jointly.
>>
>>         avri
>>
>>         On 12-Oct-15 08:53, Edward Morris wrote:
>>         > Hi guys,
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > I've attached a copy of a draft Reconsideration Request
>>         I've been
>>         > working on with Phil Corwin. There may be some changes in
>>         grammar and
>>         > the like but substantially this is likely to be what we'd
>>         hope to
>>         > submit. As the deadline for submission is tomorrow comments
>>         / approval
>>         > is requested.
>>         >
>>         > The base issue at hand is staff imposing new gTLD RPM's on
>>         legacy
>>         > gTLD's through newel agreements. This is de facto
>>         development of
>>         > consensus policy through contract by staff rather than
>>         through a
>>         > properly constituted pop. As we've previously discussed on list
>>         > this needs to be opposed if the GNSO hopes to maintain its
>>         current role.
>>         >
>>         > We and the BC certainly do not share common positions on the
>>         > substantive issue involved here; that is, the BC would be
>>         very happy
>>         > to have the new RPM's applied to legacy gTLD's while that
>>         > traditionally has not been our position. It's been a bit of a
>>         > challenge to get language acceptable to both in this regard
>>         as Phil
>>         > head some specific instructions but hopefully we've done do.
>>         >
>>         > I'll turn this over to our esteemed Chair and PC head
>>         honcho to see
>>         > how / if we can sign off on this. Again, the submission
>>         deadline is
>>         > tomorrow so this needs to get done pronto. It's rare to get
>>         a CSG
>>         > member to oppose ip expansion, even on a procedural basis,
>>         so I hope
>>         > we can take advantage of this opportunity.
>>         >
>>         > Best,
>>         >
>>         > Ed
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > PC-NCSG mailing list
>>         > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>         > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>         ---
>>         This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>         software.
>>         https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         PC-NCSG mailing list
>>         PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>         http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus





More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list