[PC-NCSG] Reconsideration
Avri Doria
avri
Tue Oct 13 18:20:04 EEST 2015
Hi,
I have no objection as long as it is submitted jointly, with both names
listed.
avri
On 13-Oct-15 07:08, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> less than 3 hours ( to be exact 2h52min) to hear any objection, after
> that Ed can confirm with Phil and Steve, and submit the RR
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-10-13 17:36 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net
> <mailto:egmorris1 at toast.net>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> The BC is still evaluating this internally for approval. Once
> granted, I believe that Steve DelBianco will be listed as the BC
> requestor.
>
> Ed
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 4:53 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Avri,
>>
>> I think Phil didn't put his name yet but he should do. he only
>> put his contact info.
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2015-10-13 4:48 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Confused, it looks like it is just from Rafik in terms of the
>> submission.
>>
>> I thought i twas being submitted jointly.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 12-Oct-15 08:53, Edward Morris wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> >
>> > I've attached a copy of a draft Reconsideration Request
>> I've been
>> > working on with Phil Corwin. There may be some changes in
>> grammar and
>> > the like but substantially this is likely to be what we'd
>> hope to
>> > submit. As the deadline for submission is tomorrow comments
>> / approval
>> > is requested.
>> >
>> > The base issue at hand is staff imposing new gTLD RPM's on
>> legacy
>> > gTLD's through newel agreements. This is de facto
>> development of
>> > consensus policy through contract by staff rather than
>> through a
>> > properly constituted pop. As we've previously discussed on list
>> > this needs to be opposed if the GNSO hopes to maintain its
>> current role.
>> >
>> > We and the BC certainly do not share common positions on the
>> > substantive issue involved here; that is, the BC would be
>> very happy
>> > to have the new RPM's applied to legacy gTLD's while that
>> > traditionally has not been our position. It's been a bit of a
>> > challenge to get language acceptable to both in this regard
>> as Phil
>> > head some specific instructions but hopefully we've done do.
>> >
>> > I'll turn this over to our esteemed Chair and PC head
>> honcho to see
>> > how / if we can sign off on this. Again, the submission
>> deadline is
>> > tomorrow so this needs to get done pronto. It's rare to get
>> a CSG
>> > member to oppose ip expansion, even on a procedural basis,
>> so I hope
>> > we can take advantage of this opportunity.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PC-NCSG mailing list
>> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>> software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list