[PC-NCSG] Reconsideration
Edward Morris
egmorris1
Tue Oct 13 11:36:06 EEST 2015
Hi,
The BC is still evaluating this internally for approval. Once granted, I believe that Steve DelBianco will be listed as the BC requestor.
Ed
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 4:53 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Avri,
>
> I think Phil didn't put his name yet but he should do. he only put his contact info.
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-10-13 4:48 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Confused, it looks like it is just from Rafik in terms of the submission.
>>
>> I thought i twas being submitted jointly.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 12-Oct-15 08:53, Edward Morris wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> >
>> > I've attached a copy of a draft Reconsideration Request I've been
>> > working on with Phil Corwin. There may be some changes in grammar and
>> > the like but substantially this is likely to be what we'd hope to
>> > submit. As the deadline for submission is tomorrow comments / approval
>> > is requested.
>> >
>> > The base issue at hand is staff imposing new gTLD RPM's on legacy
>> > gTLD's through newel agreements. This is de facto development of
>> > consensus policy through contract by staff rather than through a
>> > properly constituted pop. As we've previously discussed on list
>> > this needs to be opposed if the GNSO hopes to maintain its current role.
>> >
>> > We and the BC certainly do not share common positions on the
>> > substantive issue involved here; that is, the BC would be very happy
>> > to have the new RPM's applied to legacy gTLD's while that
>> > traditionally has not been our position. It's been a bit of a
>> > challenge to get language acceptable to both in this regard as Phil
>> > head some specific instructions but hopefully we've done do.
>> >
>> > I'll turn this over to our esteemed Chair and PC head honcho to see
>> > how / if we can sign off on this. Again, the submission deadline is
>> > tomorrow so this needs to get done pronto. It's rare to get a CSG
>> > member to oppose ip expansion, even on a procedural basis, so I hope
>> > we can take advantage of this opportunity.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PC-NCSG mailing list
>> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20151013/2dbc4c06/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list