[PC-NCSG] Options for Increasing CCWG Discussions at ICANN54

[Matthew Shears]

Well if we don't we will have to do it anyway after Dublin and then it 
is no longer F2F and we lose an opportunity for possible wrapping this 
up in some form and things get delayed.....

I would support extra time.

On 09/10/2015 06:50, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> any comment?
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-10-09 5:58 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     There is discussion about increasing the allocated time for CCWG
>     in dublin. Several options are proposed in the attached document.
>     Personally, I doubt that putting more hours would be effective for
>     CCWG discussions.
>
>     Best.
>
>     Rafik
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20151009/af084d56/attachment.html>