[PC-NCSG] Arguments Rejected

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Ed,


2015-10-02 0:59 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
>
>>
> thanks for the work done, wondering how to proceed here. I don't recall if
> there was any support at the public comment period.
>
>
>
> Lots. Phil Corwin and the BC actually led the charge on this issue against
> the IPC which had the the minority, and winning, view. It sort of makes one
> wonder about the public comment process.
>
> We need to request an Issues Report on the URS. It's a bit risky in that
> it might legitimize a bad rpm tool but I don't think a Reconsideration
> would be worth the effort, although if someone has the time to do one I'd
> be happy to help.
>
>
I thought there is already a report about all RPM
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-09-11-en

Rafik

>
> In other news, the Board chose Panama City as the host of next summers
>> ICANN meeting. With the fall meeting in Puerto Rico that means our Meetings
>> for next year will be held in two locations 1,100 miles from each other.
>> London and Dublin, the sites for the next and last European meetings, are
>> about 290 miles from each other. That is more diverse than our last two
>> Latin American meetings prior to Panama City, both of which were held in
>> Buenos Aires. To the extent ICANN's Meeting strategy is part of ICANN's
>> global outreach strategy I would suggest it needs some work.
>>
>>
> well you can 2 times for  Singapore. the last Asian city , which is not
> Singapore, was Beijing in  2013  . in fact it sounds with the meetings
> requirements, it become more harder different hosts. again wondering how it
> will be the new meeting format starting in 2016.
>
>
> We need to ascertain what is going on here. It can't be exclusively cost;
> London and Dublin are expensive  cities. I'll try to talk to Meetings staff
> in Dublin and see if I can get some background to share with everyone. The
> meetings are large but they are not the largest and other groups manage to
> find diverse locations. I was actually in favor of the Hub city strategy
> but if we are using the meetings, as argued, as part of the global outreach
> initiative...well, it's a big globe.
>
> Best,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> A complete rundown of the Board's resolutions from Monday can be found
>> here:
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-09-28-en#2.f
>>  .
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20151002/281d1113/attachment.html>