[PC-NCSG] IAG public comment

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi Bill,

Not sure what membership numbers you?re referring to. I can?t locate any reference to NCSG?s membership numbers in EFF?s comment.

Thanks.

Amr 

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 3:58 PM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> From the peanut gallery?
> 
> I don?t have a vote, but would say the letter?s fine except that we ought to use accurate membership numbers when referring to ourselves.
> 
> Best
> 
> Bill
> 
>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
>> 
>> Agreed.
>> 
>> Tapani
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:20:30PM +0800, David Cake (dave at difference.com.au) wrote:
>> 
>>> We are obviously past the deadline, but I also would be happy to endorse Jeremys comment.
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 8:17 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Having just gotten around to reading the IAG report and Jeremy?s comment, I too would like the NCSG to endorse the comment. Note that Jeremy already submitted it on October 19th, so we do not need to resubmit it. You?ll find it in the archives here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-iag-whois-05oct15/msg00001.html
>>>> 
>>>> Would be great to hear from more folks on this as soon as possible. As Tapani has indicated, we?re well past the deadline on this one.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Amr
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Sam Lanfranco <Lanfran at yorku.ca> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tapani,
>>>>> 
>>>>> It is my individual opinion that the Jeremy Malcolm comment is of the right tone and focus and I urge consensus with regard to submitting the document within the comments deadline. The key NCSG comment would be:
>>>>> 
>>>>>  "..allow any applicant to have recourse of the WHOIS Conflicts Procedure if it is compelled to do so by locally applicable law, without any formality."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any other process would be needlessly burdensome and runs the risk of local authorities using the process as a way of unduly burdening the Contracted Party as a form of abuse and/or punishment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sam L.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 17/11/2015 2:24 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>>>>>> Following up on recent call, the deadline for public comments on
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IAG Initial Report and Proposed Revisions to the ICANN Procedure for
>>>>>> Whois Conflicts with Privacy Laws
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> is today at 23:59 UTC, or in about 4? hours.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We've got a draft comment written by Jeremy Malcolm here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11HplKsNmXJayM8fBE6v_e3JcAkvuSz5pTFRH_YrGURw/edit
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We can try to submit a bit later and hope they'll accept it anyway,
>>>>>> but it should nonetheless be done as soon as possible.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
>>>>> in an unjust state" -Confucius
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>>>>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>>>>> email: Lanfran at Yorku.ca   Skype: slanfranco
>>>>> blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>>>>> Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> *********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q
> *********************************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg