[PC-NCSG] VC election

[Milan, Stefania]

fine with me. thanks all

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 13, 2015, at 18:09, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 13 17:10, David Cake (dave at difference.com.au) wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I?m ok with any procedure that:
>> - acknowledges that, unless we are explicitly bound, an NCSG PC decision does not bind our councillors, so we need to individually state our position and
>> - includes the NCA.
>
> Agreed.
>
> It is not a PC decision but councillors' decision.
>
>> While its a fairly terrible recipe for a long term solution,
>> Wolf-Ulrichs suggestion does provide a method for moving forward
>> from here.
>
> Yes.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.