[PC-NCSG] Council Chair and Vice Chair Elections - Second Take

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi again,

Thanks for the thoughts that have been expressed so far. You should all be subscribed to the NCPH Leadership list, so you should have seen Greg?s response to my email. If you?re not getting emails from the NCPH list, please let me know.

Anyway?, it looks like the CSG thoughts on Heather VCing the council are consistent with what has been discussed on this list. If there are no objections, I will communicate this to the CSG.

Anyone else should feel free to speak up on the NCPH list as well. It?s obviously desirable that we have a coordinated consensus position on this issue, but the NCPH list is to facilitate discussion among the two non-contracted SGs, so please, use it.

The other point Greg made was electing James by acclamation. We haven?t really discussed whether or not our councillors would like to support James in a new round of council chair elections. Personally, I am glad he is still willing to run, and plan on supporting him. It?d be helpful to know whether or not, we can get him elected by acclamation, or if we would need to vote. We probably will anyway. I?m not sure there is a procedure that allows for no vote to take place, but I guess we?ll see.

It has also been recently pointed out to me that another call with James may be helpful for those who still have questions for him. Would folks here like to have another interview set up with him, or with Heather for that matter?

Let me know.

Thanks.

Amr

> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:35 AM, David Cake <dave at DIFFERENCE.COM.AU> wrote:
> 
> I think we all want that Sam, but I think its only the CSG who can provide it at this point.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> David
> 
>> On 4 Nov 2015, at 2:29 pm, Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I too am pretty much in agreement here but am also waiting for a bit of clarity so I am sure that we agree about what we are agreeing to.
>> 
>> Sam L
>> 
>> On 2015-11-03 9:19 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Milan, Stefania <Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I, too, agree with the proposed "consensus solution", provided we are interpreting correctly the thoughts (and the moves) of the other parts of our house.
>>> Yes. I hope we aren?t misinterpreting their intent. So far, apart from a private email from Tony Holmes, they?ve been quiet. Not sure why. Waiting for some kind of activity on the NCPH list.
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Amr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> *--------------------------------------------*
>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
>> in an unjust state" -Confucius
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>> YorkU email: Lanfran at Yorku.ca   Skype: slanfranco
>> blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>> Phone: 613 476-0429 cell: 416-816-2852
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg