[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

[Stephanie Perrin]

Well, the proof of the synthesis will be in the eating, as they say 
about puddings.  Has anyone ever done a study on the analysis of 
comments?  The EWG did not set me up for a feeling of confidence.
cheers SP

On 2015-05-23 0:54, Avri Doria wrote:
> hi,
>
> If you look at the review tool, you know that of course it will be
> included.  And the common practice, which i do not suppose with change
> for the group you are in, is to work through each and every comment.
>
> But it can hardly be included among the trends, if it did not trend.
>
> I will not opine on your mental state.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 23-May-15 00:49, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> Call me paranoid, but I was worried about that new review tool.  Does
>> this mean we have to have a certain percentage of the comments to have
>> our comments duly noted?  Sure looks like it.....I am of course
>> thinking about our upcoming comments on PPSAI and WHOIS accuracy.....
>> Stephanie P
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: 	Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment
>> summary and review tool
>> Date: 	Fri, 22 May 2015 16:41:10 -0400
>> From: 	Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
>> To: 	Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>
>> CC: 	cwg-stewardship at icann.org <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>, Brenda
>> Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com
>> <mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      That does help Bernie.  In other words, if an opinion wasn???t
>>      supported by at least 10% of the commenters, i.e., at least 4
>>      commenters, it was included in the numbers for the trend presentation.
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Chuck
>>
>>       
>>
>>      *From:*Bernard Turcotte [mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com
>>      <mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>]
>>      *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2015 3:41 PM
>>      *To:* Gomes, Chuck
>>      *Cc:* Grace Abuhamad; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>>      <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>; Brenda Brewer
>>      *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment
>>      summary and review tool
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Chuck,
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Exactly what it says, if for a given category 10% or more of
>>      respondents stated an opinion for or against it was included.
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Does this help?
>>
>>       
>>
>>      B.
>>
>>       
>>
>>      On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com
>>      <mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      Thanks a lot to everyone on the staff team for doing this so
>>      quickly.
>>
>>       
>>
>>      On  slide 4 of the presentation showing the major trends, what
>>      does the following statement mean: ???Those categories
>>      representing more than 10% of responses are presented in this
>>      document.????
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Chuck
>>
>>       
>>
>>      *From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>>      <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>
>>      [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>>      <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Grace
>>      Abuhamad
>>      *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2015 2:34 PM
>>      *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>>      *Cc:* Brenda Brewer
>>      *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment
>>      summary and review tool
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Dear all,
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Staff has compiled a summary overview of the pubic comment
>>      submissions and filled out a public comment review tool, noting
>>      responses and specific action items for the CWG-Stewardship to
>>      consider. Please review these documents and suggest edits based on
>>      your assessment of the public comment submissions. The proposed
>>      actions for the CWG-Stewardship are highlighted in */blue/* in the
>>      response column (far right).
>>
>>       
>>
>>      The Public Comment Review Tool is very long and may be difficult
>>      to read. This is due to staff???s approach in thorough and
>>      detailed review. *We will provide a more digestible,
>>      action-focused, version of this tool for Tuesday???s meeting. *We
>>      are providing the long version to you today to demonstrate our
>>      work progress and preparation for next week???s high-intensity
>>      meetings.
>>
>>       
>>
>>      While the Public Comment Review Tool is very detailed, the summary
>>      overview is presented in a presentation format and focuses more on
>>      the ???bigger picture???. Depending on your review-style, you may
>>      be inclined to start with one or the other document.
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Also, please note that these documents incorporate all (44)
>>      submissions received up until the deadline on 20 May at 23:59
>>      UTC. As of 22 May at 16:00 UTC, there are (7) late submissions.
>>      These submissions have not yet been incorporated in this document
>>      but will be added in time for the high-intensity meetings (along
>>      with the submissions received based on the extension for those who
>>      are reliant on translations).
>>
>>       
>>
>>      As a reminder, Brenda kindly pulled all the submissions together
>>      on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/o5A0Aw. You can
>>      download all the files at once (like a zip file) by clicking
>>      on the ???download all??? button at the bottom left side of the
>>      macro.
>>
>>       
>>
>>      Have a good (submission-reading-filled) weekend,
>>
>>      Grace
>>
>>
>>      _______________________________________________
>>      CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>      CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>>      https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>       
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg