[PC-NCSG] discussing distribution of ICANN material

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,



> first I think that the admin staff was unfairly treated and got implicit
> accusations of wrongdoings in public list. this should be answered.
>
>
> Specifics Rafik. "Implicit accusations of wrongdoing". Where did that come
> from?
>
> Folks here seem to want to personalize this. Wrongdoing?
>
>
I am not personalising it, I am stating how your message can be
interpreted. you kept mentioning that she shared a video of her employer,
stressing that part several times .then you implied that probably she was
asked to do. you have no fact to support your claims so yes it is an
accusation.

>
>
>
> regarding material distribution, there is one element we should have in
> mind : they are publicly available and such emails are merely notifying
> people about their existence. The admin support is trying to be proactive
> and helpful. Maryam usually check with me about sending announcements
> (while I still send most of them) but I gave her an implicit approval to
> share. we are not supposed to do gatekeeper work but we can do better job
> to explain the background about those public information.
>
> do we really want NCSG to do content policing now? ironic situation.
>
>
> Then open the list to nonmembers. Let's let Richard Hill post his pro-ITU
> ideas. If Steve DelBianco wants to address our members then let's allow it.
> Once staff starts posting substantive material it no longer is a members
> only list and should be open to all.
>
>
straw-man argument. the list is open for NCSG members and Maryam was added
to do her admin tasks. the admin staff is merely sharing public info that
are already online and accessible to everyone!!!! she is not participating
in policy-making, the discussion or whatever.  probably you prefer me as an
elected admin worker?

Policing content? That's a rubbish accusation. A members list is for
> members, not staff. Or so I thought.
>
>
we are 24hour from the deadline to submit the comment on IANA stewardship
and we have to spend time on this.

Rafik

>
> 2015-05-19 16:59 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I really think we should have held a discussion of what materials are
>> appropriate to pass on to the NCSG membership in either the EC or the
>> PC.  I do not think it appropriate to have berated a staff member who is
>> attempting to help us by keeping us informed in such a public manner.
>>
>> I think it was cruel and unnecessary.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150519/bbcd6179/attachment-0001.html>