[PC-NCSG] Revised Formatting of the NCSG Response to the Policy and Implementation Working Group Initial Report

Amr Elsadr aelsadr
Thu Mar 19 16:48:17 EET 2015


Hi again,

The adjusted format has been submitted, and available here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/msg00006.html

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I?m sending this email to the PC list along with Marika and Mary from ICANN Policy Staff to clear something up regarding the NCSG response to the Policy and Implementation WG initial report.
> 
> If you all recall, a PDF version of the NCSG input was circulated and presented during last week?s webinar. A later draft was circulated, in which input provided by NCSG members was added to the answers of the survey questions. This created a problem, because some of the text provided in the file wasn?t viewable because of the insufficient size of the text box.
> 
> To manage this, I did two things:
> 
> 1. I copied the NCSG responses to the Web-based survey to ensure that the WG would have access to them in their entirety.
> 2. I also sent the PDF version with the ?unviewable? text using what I believe to be a secure File Transfer Protocol embedded in the file to the public comment forum. I did this, so that there would be a readily available reference to the NCSG response that anyone could access, and also hoped that the formatting would somehow change to make all the answers viewable. I thought this possible, because there were other submissions on the public comment forum in which the formatting was different.
> 
> Anyway?, it didn?t work the way I hoped, and this is what we ended up with:
> 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/msg00003.html
> 
> The WG had its first call to review the public comment submission yesterday, and the NCSG response is included in the public comment review tool, so there is no need to be concerned about our input not being submitted and considered. However, Marika was kind enough to provide a PDF extract of the NCSG response to the Web-based survey. I?ve attached it to this email.
> 
> Marika and Mary, could you please arrange to have this file be listed on the public comment forum as the NCSG response to the working group?s initial report, and have the email already posted be removed. The current NCSG submission on the public comment forum appears to be nothing but random lines of code that aren?t really very helpful to anyone who would like to look them up.
> 
> To be clear, I am asking ICANN Policy Staff to take an action on our behalf. There is no action required on the part of the Policy Committee, but thought it would be a good idea to have everyone on the same page to avoid any confusion. Certainly don?t want anyone to think that staff tampered with our response in any way.
> 
> The attached version with the amended formatting has already been uploaded to the NCSG Wiki space as well.
> 
> So thanks to all, and my apologies about all the confusion.
> 
> Amr
> 
> <NCSG Response to the Initial Report and Recommendations of the GNSO Policy and Implementation WG + Adjusted Formatting.pdf>_______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg





More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list