[PC-NCSG] A working group to develop recommendations on new gTLD auction proceeds

Wed Mar 18 02:48:48 EET 2015

Hi Amr,

thanks, I sent our response.

Rafik

2015-03-17 20:23 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:

> Hi,
>
> Yes. I believe so. There have been no objections to a CCWG taking this on.
> When communicating this to Jonathan, it may also be noteworthy to explain
> that although the NCSG is supportive of a CCWG being established, we would
> also participate in a GNSO working group if it comes to that for any reason.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amr,
>
> I think we got enough expression of support for setting a working group. I
> can send the response to Glen and Jonathan to say yes we are in favor of
> the initiative.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-03-16 18:33 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org>:
>
>>
>> I am also happy to contribute.
>>
>>
>> On 3/14/2015 4:51 AM, William Drake wrote:
>>
>> Sounds right to me
>>
>>  Bill
>>
>>  On Mar 12, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> As a starter position.
>>
>> I support the idea of a CWG that includes GNSO & ALAC and possibly GAC.
>>
>> I think the group should:
>>
>> - collect the various nputs on what should be done
>> - should gain consensus on the top n possibilities for further
>> exploration and implementation.
>>
>> Whether it is a CWG or a GNSO WG, I will volunteer to be involved.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 12-Mar-15 08:11, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>  I?ve unintentionally neglected this discussion, but would like to pick
>> it up again. We only have a couple of days to send a response, but I don?t
>> think it would hurt to let Glen know we?ll be a few days late on this one.
>> It isn?t on the agenda for the next Council meeting, so maybe asking her
>> for an extra week won?t be too disruptive.
>>
>>  Remember, we?re being asked whether or not the NCSG would be willing to
>> participate in a CCWG on this topic. Other SOs/ACs are getting this same
>> question. If there is no support from outside the GNSO to do this (which I
>> very much doubt), the GNSO will create its own working group to address the
>> issue. This WG will, of course, be open to participation by anyone.
>>
>>  Thoughts?
>>
>>  Thanks.
>>
>>  Amr
>>
>>  On Mar 4, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi ,
>>
>>  if it is cross-community WG, I guess that may make sense to have it
>> with ALAC and less with GAC.
>> seeing all statements to get involved in the working group, I guess we
>> have to wait for th idea of group to get traction and to have it formed
>> first :) but I would that such group will be open to everybody to
>> participate.
>>
>>  Rafik
>>
>> 2015-03-04 20:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  I feel the same as Avri. I wonder if anyone has any preferences on
>>> this being a CCWG or a GNSO WG.
>>>
>>>  Thanks.
>>>
>>>  Amr
>>>
>>>  On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>  hi,
>>>
>>> I am interested but just don't know if i have the bandwidth or energy to
>>> dive back into this swamp.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04-Mar-15 10:31, Edward Morris wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 5:31 AM, Stephanie Perrin <
>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Yes and I want to volunteer for that group.  I am new and have no
>>> baggage from previous resource wars.  I also have considerable budget
>>> planning experience.
>>> cheers SP
>>>
>>> On 2015-03-04 0:19, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  we should give an initial response for this : forming a working group
>>> on new gTLD auctions proceeds.
>>> I think there were positive comments from our side during Singapore
>>> meeting and it is something we advocated for for years.
>>> can we get a short statement to express our support for such effort?
>>>
>>>  Best,
>>>
>>>  Rafik
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org>
>>> Date: 2015-03-02 19:14 GMT+09:00
>>> Subject: A working group to develop recommendations on new gTLD auction
>>> proceeds
>>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>, Marika Konings <
>>> marika.konings at icann.org>, "gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear SO/AC Chairs,
>>>
>>>
>>> *A working group to develop recommendations on new gTLD auction proceeds*
>>>
>>>
>>> During the GNSO weekend sessions at ICANN 52 in Singapore, the GNSO
>>> discussed the issue of new gTLD auction proceeds. As you know, new gTLD
>>> auction proceeds have been building up and there is no current plan in
>>> place for the use or allocation of these funds.
>>>
>>>
>>> In order to commence discussions on a plan for the use of new gTLD
>>> auction proceeds, the GNSO would like to form a working group to develop
>>> recommendations on this topic. As such, I am reaching out to you to see
>>> whether there is an interest to form a cross-community working group on
>>> this topic. Note, should there not be sufficient interest to form a
>>> cross-community working group at this stage, the GNSO plans to form a GNSO
>>> working group on this topic which will be open to anyone interested to
>>> participate in.  Regardless of which approach is chosen, it is the GNSO?s
>>> expectation that any work on this topic will be conducted through an open
>>> and consultative process allowing everyone interested to participate and
>>> provide their perspectives.
>>>
>>>
>>> In order to determine the interest from the different communities in
>>> this topic, I would like to ask you to provide an initial response to me by *14
>>> March 2015* at the latest. Based on the feedback received, the GNSO
>>> Council will initially discuss how to proceed at its meeting on 19 March
>>> 2015.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan Robinson
>>>
>>> For and on behalf of the ICANN GNSO Council
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150318/8a43c668/attachment-0001.html>