[PC-NCSG] A working group to develop recommendations on new gTLD auction proceeds

Matthew Shears mshears
Mon Mar 16 11:33:57 EET 2015


I am also happy to contribute.

On 3/14/2015 4:51 AM, William Drake wrote:
> Sounds right to me
>
> Bill
>
>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG 
>> <mailto:avri at ACM.ORG>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As a starter position.
>>
>> I support the idea of a CWG that includes GNSO & ALAC and possibly GAC.
>>
>> I think the group should:
>>
>> - collect the various nputs on what should be done
>> - should gain consensus on the top n possibilities for further 
>> exploration and implementation.
>>
>> Whether it is a CWG or a GNSO WG, I will volunteer to be involved.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 12-Mar-15 08:11, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I?ve unintentionally neglected this discussion, but would like to 
>>> pick it up again. We only have a couple of days to send a response, 
>>> but I don?t think it would hurt to let Glen know we?ll be a few days 
>>> late on this one. It isn?t on the agenda for the next Council 
>>> meeting, so maybe asking her for an extra week won?t be too disruptive.
>>>
>>> Remember, we?re being asked whether or not the NCSG would be willing 
>>> to participate in a CCWG on this topic. Other SOs/ACs are getting 
>>> this same question. If there is no support from outside the GNSO to 
>>> do this (which I very much doubt), the GNSO will create its own 
>>> working group to address the issue. This WG will, of course, be open 
>>> to participation by anyone.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Amr
>>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM 
>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi ,
>>>>
>>>> if it is cross-community WG, I guess that may make sense to have it 
>>>> with ALAC and less with GAC.
>>>> seeing all statements to get involved in the working group, I guess 
>>>> we have to wait for th idea of group to get traction and to have it 
>>>> formed first :) but I would that such group will be open to 
>>>> everybody to participate.
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> 2015-03-04 20:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org 
>>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi,
>>>>
>>>>     I feel the same as Avri. I wonder if anyone has any preferences
>>>>     on this being a CCWG or a GNSO WG.
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>     Amr
>>>>
>>>>     On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>>>     <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>     I am interested but just don't know if i have the bandwidth or
>>>>>     energy to dive back into this swamp.
>>>>>
>>>>>     avri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 04-Mar-15 10:31, Edward Morris wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On Mar 4, 2015, at 5:31 AM, Stephanie Perrin
>>>>>>     <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>>>>>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Yes and I want to volunteer for that group.  I am new and
>>>>>>>     have no baggage from previous resource wars. I also have
>>>>>>>     considerable budget planning experience.
>>>>>>>     cheers SP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     On 2015-03-04 0:19, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>>>>>     Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     we should give an initial response for this : forming a
>>>>>>>>     working group on new gTLD auctions proceeds.
>>>>>>>>     I think there were positive comments from our side during
>>>>>>>>     Singapore meeting and it is something we advocated for for
>>>>>>>>     years.
>>>>>>>>     can we get a short statement to express our support for
>>>>>>>>     such effort?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Rafik
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>     From: *Glen de Saint G?ry* <Glen at icann.org
>>>>>>>>     <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>     Date: 2015-03-02 19:14 GMT+09:00
>>>>>>>>     Subject: A working group to develop recommendations on new
>>>>>>>>     gTLD auction proceeds
>>>>>>>>     To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>     Cc: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info
>>>>>>>>     <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>, Marika Konings
>>>>>>>>     <marika.konings at icann.org
>>>>>>>>     <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>, "gnso-secs at icann.org
>>>>>>>>     <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>" <gnso-secs at icann.org
>>>>>>>>     <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Dear SO/AC Chairs,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     *A working group to develop recommendations on new gTLD
>>>>>>>>     auction proceeds*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     During the GNSO weekend sessions at ICANN 52 in Singapore,
>>>>>>>>     the GNSO discussed the issue of new gTLD auction proceeds.
>>>>>>>>     As you know, new gTLD auction proceeds have been building
>>>>>>>>     up and there is no current plan in place for the use or
>>>>>>>>     allocation of these funds.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     In order to commence discussions on a plan for the use of
>>>>>>>>     new gTLD auction proceeds, the GNSO would like to form a
>>>>>>>>     working group to develop recommendations on this topic. As
>>>>>>>>     such, I am reaching out to you to see whether there is an
>>>>>>>>     interest to form a cross-community working group on this
>>>>>>>>     topic. Note, should there not be sufficient interest to
>>>>>>>>     form a cross-community working group at this stage, the
>>>>>>>>     GNSO plans to form a GNSO working group on this topic which
>>>>>>>>     will be open to anyone interested to participate in.
>>>>>>>>     Regardless of which approach is chosen, it is the GNSO?s
>>>>>>>>     expectation that any work on this topic will be conducted
>>>>>>>>     through an open and consultative process allowing everyone
>>>>>>>>     interested to participate and provide their perspectives.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     In order to determine the interest from the different
>>>>>>>>     communities in this topic, I would like to ask you to
>>>>>>>>     provide an initial response to me by *14 March 2015* at the
>>>>>>>>     latest. Based on the feedback received, the GNSO Council
>>>>>>>>     will initially discuss how to proceed at its meeting on 19
>>>>>>>>     March 2015.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Jonathan Robinson
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     For and on behalf of the ICANN GNSO Council
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150316/859b7b92/attachment-0001.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list