[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Fwd: Identity Validation Comments

[Stephanie Perrin]

I agree, and my own question was, how do we wind up moving to test id 
validation without a policy process to support it?
Stephanie
On 2015-03-13 10:26, Edward Morris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org 
> <mailto:mshears at cdt.org>> wrote:
>
>
>     I'm fine with this overall and think it is a good piece of work. 
>     Just to note that while this is not my "space" rather than
>     encouraging ICANN to bring on more staff to address these issues
>     should we not just say NO until and when the community has
>     decicded that this issue should be addressed?  I am very concerned
>     about scope creep - this is yet another example of why we need
>     absolutely explicit limitations on staff, Board and CEO in the
>     accountability track.
>
>     Matthew
>
>
> Excellent point Matt.
>
> In fact, I need to rework the stress test proposal I made yesterday, 
> at Robin's suggestion ( 
> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability4/2015-March/000121.html 
> ) to include policy improperly made by staff as well as policy changed 
> by staff during implementation. Thanks for focusing on this in your post.
>
> Ed
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150313/df603490/attachment.html>