[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [EWG-Process-WG] EP-WG Framework v5 for your review

[Stephanie Perrin]

Somehow, I don't think this answers all our concerns...
But be assured, more detailed comments will follow!
Stephanie
And many thanks for forwarding.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:52 AM
To: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Reply To: avri at acm.org
Subject: [PC-NCSG] Fwd: [EWG-Process-WG] EP-WG Framework v5 for your review



fyi - advice welcome, as always.

avri

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        [EWG-Process-WG] EP-WG Framework v5 for your review
Date:   Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:36:32 -0600
From:   Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com><mailto:lisa at corecom.com>
To:     ewg-process-wg at icann.org<mailto:ewg-process-wg at icann.org>


Dear all,

Per Susan's request, attached please find an updated draft of the EP-WG framework for your consideration and discussion during next week?s  EP-WG call.

This update attempts to address all questions raised in Singapore; you will find suggested new text highlighted in red. Three placeholders were also inserted for EP-WG members to answer unaddressed questions on cost assessment, input timing, and GNSO decision points.

In addition, the entire document has been reorganized to better decompose and explain complex steps and phases, presenting them more sequentially. This reorganization is not intended to add new material, except as highlighted in red. Rather, the reorganization moves and expands existing material to make the framework easier for the community to digest.

Please consider whether this updated draft covers questions raised in Singapore and does a sufficient job of communicating your proposed framework for an RDS PDP. Please also consider how to complete the three placeholders for unaddressed questions. Your feedback on this draft will be the subject of next week?s EP-WG call, along cost analysis input from James and Chris, and any other business that should addressed at this juncture. A meeting notice with agenda will follow from Charla.

Best, Lisa




________________________________
[http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] <http://www.avast.com/>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150310/fc2fbaa1/attachment.html>