[PC-NCSG] Fwd: FW: Request for Input: IGO/INGO Curative Rights

[David Cake]

Yes, Kathy and I are involved in this group. We did both attend the f2f in Singapore, though it was somewhat frustrating as some important discussions with the GAC putting forward their detailed reasons for their advice to the group had not been received in time, and we ended up breaking early.
This group is proceeding quite slowly as a lot of quite complex legal discussion is involved, and we want to get it right. We are definitely still keen to get any input. Kathy is a better person than me to advice on the work of the group so far, as I?m not a lawyer.

David

On 6 Mar 2015, at 7:44 pm, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> it sounds we get another chance to respond to this and we need a volunteer to draft a response. I think Kathy and David are member in the WG, and had one day session in Singapore.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org>
> Date: 2015-03-06 7:42 GMT+09:00
> Subject: FW: Request for Input: IGO/INGO Curative Rights
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Petter Rindforth (petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu) (petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu)" <petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu>, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com>, Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org" <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
> 
> 
> Dear Rafik,
> 
> On behalf of Philip Corwin & Petter Rindforth (WG Co-Chairs) of the PDP IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms WG, we would like to seek any comments and input that you and the organization you Chair are able to provide regarding the email originally sent 9 December 2014. While the letter accompanying that email had requested response by 23 January 2015, comments and input are very much still welcome.
> 
> If you have any questions, please let us know.
> 
> Thank you.
> Kind regards.
> 
> Glen
> 
> Glen de Saint G?ry
> 
> GNSO Secretariat
> 
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> 
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Glen de Saint G?ry [mailto:Glen at icann.org]
> Sent: vendredi 9 janvier 2015 09:37
> To: Rafik Dammak
> Cc: Mary Wong; Steve Chan; Phil Corwin; Petter Rindforth (petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu) (petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu); gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> Subject: FW: Request for Input: IGO/INGO Curative Rights
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Rafik,
> 
> 
> 
> On behalf of Philip Corwin & Petter Rindforth (WG Co-Chairs) of the PDP IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms WG, we would like to provide a friendly reminder that the WG hopes to receive any comments and input that you and the organization you Chair are able to provide, regarding the email below, by Friday, 23 January 2015. If you have any questions, please let us know.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Glen
> 
>  Glen de Saint G?ry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> From: Glen de Saint G?ry
> Sent: vendredi 12 d?cembre 2014 00:07
> To: Rafik Dammak
> Cc: Steve Chan; Glen de Saint G?ry; gnso-secs at icann.org
> Subject: FW: Request for Input: IGO/INGO Curative Rights
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Rafik,
> 
> 
> 
> In regards to the email below, it was brought to our attention that there is some confusion regarding which questions the working group is seeking feedback. Please see the revised message below from the co-chairs of the group:
> 
> 
> 
> "On behalf of Philip Corwin & Petter Rindforth (WG Co-Chairs) of the PDP IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms WG, we seek to inform you that the WG has come to some initial conclusions and wish to update you on the activities within this WG, as well as request your input on 4 questions contained in the attachment to the original email"
> 
> 
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Glen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Glen de Saint G?ry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> 
> From: Glen de Saint G?ry
> Sent: mercredi 10 d?cembre 2014 00:25
> To: Rafik Dammak
> Cc: Glen de Saint G?ry; gnso-secs at icann.org; Steve Chan
> Subject: Request for Input: IGO/INGO Curative Rights
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Rafik,
> 
> 
> 
> On behalf of Philip Corwin & Petter Rindforth (WG Co--?Chairs) of the PDP IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms WG we request your input on:
> 
> (1) Whether the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and/or the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) should be amended, and if so, how; or
> 
> 
> 
> (2) Whether a separate, narrowly-tailored dispute resolution procedure modeled on the UDRP and/or the URS should be developed, in either case to address the specific needs and concerns of International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and/or International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs).
> 
> Please see the attached document for full details.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Glen
> 
> Glen de Saint G?ry
> 
> GNSO Secretariat
> 
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> 
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <ICANN-IGO-Letter to GNSO SG Cs for initial input-Final_draft.pdf>_______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150309/ff78df59/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150309/ff78df59/attachment.sig>