[PC-NCSG] .cat, .pro

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Ed,

thanks for the reminder. it makes sense, we can just check if there is any
other point we would like to raise or add that we didn't make previously.
it is good to get comments in record.

Best Regards,

Rafik

2015-06-26 13:04 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>:

> Hi everyone,
>
> The public comment period for .cat and .pro closes on July 7th. Both of
> these legacy tld's have the same problem we faced with .travel: a staff
> attempt to create de facto consensus policy outside the pdp via contract.
>
> We submitted a public comment on .travel:
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-travel-renewal-12may15/msg00013.html.
> As the issues are identical I'd like to submit the exact same public
> comment, save for changes to the domain name involved, for .cat and .pro.
> It might be a bit boring for staff to read and analyze but I think it's
> important that the NCSG weigh in each time and in each instance that staff
> is usurping the proper policy making process.
>
> Thanks for considering,
>
> Ed
>
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150627/cf21d2e3/attachment.html>