[PC-NCSG] the issues report of the WHOIS/Board group

[Stephanie Perrin]

Got bored and finished it....actually, some of the stuff at the end is 
ok.ordering is a problem, as we know.  Assumptions are a problem.  
However, I think we need to explain those as we comment on the draft....
So I am going to comment on the entire EWG report, the oft promised 
annotated version.  You can carry it on your Ipads for future insomnia 
attacks.
we certainly need it now....
cheers steph

On 2015-06-25 14:34, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> I have not finished marking up the report, because when i get to the 
> directive section at the end, starting section 4, I find myself not in 
> sympathy with too many of the "directions" to the PDP. "needs" for 
> data should be desires.  Questions like are we collecting enough data 
> or do we need more should be thrown back, etc etc.  They do indeed 
> cite the dissent, fairly far in, but not at the beginning (I noted 
> it).  Frankly, I think your chances of changing the issues report to 
> reflect these kinds of bias are minimal, so we should focus on raising 
> a ruckus when the document goes out for public comments.
> Let me know if you disagree and think I should mark up all the 
> directions to the working group....It will take a good whack more time 
> but I can do it...
> cheers steph
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg