[PC-NCSG] Fwd: .Travel public comment

[Dorothy K. Gordon]

So far it reads well and makes all its points clearly. I am comfortable with whichever way we choose to go, incorporating the URS issue in this submission or in a separate submission. Others may know which would have more impact strategically.
best
Dorothy K. Gordon
Director-General
Ghana-India Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT
Mobile: 233 265005712
Direct Line: 233 302 683579
Website: www.aiti-kace.com.gh
Encrypt Everything - https://gpgtools.org https://silentcircle.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org>
To: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Sent: Monday, 22 June, 2015 2:41:44 PM GMT +00:00 Casablanca / Monrovia
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] Fwd:  .Travel public comment

Hi,

Why aren't we demanding that the whole issue of URS be subjected to PDP.
In fact we could submit an issue report request for a PDP on the URS.

One can accept an implementation solution as something temporary until
such time as it can undergo a PDP.  But it is time.  Especially given
the talk we heard this morning about the threat of  URS-T, aka UDRP -ez.

avri


On 22-Jun-15 09:37, Robin Gross wrote:
> Kathy, I'm just seeing this now and forwarding it on.
>
> Thank you!
> Robin
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From: *Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com
>> <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>>
>> *Subject: **Re: [PC-NCSG] .Travel public comment*
>> *Date: *June 22, 2015 4:24:03 AM PDT
>> *To: *Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com
>> <mailto:mariliamaciel at gmail.com>>, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au
>> <mailto:dave at difference.com.au>>
>> *Cc: *Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>,
>> "pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org <mailto:pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>"
>> <pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org <mailto:pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>> My email to the PC will bounce so if someone could forward this to
>> the group, I would appreciate it. 
>>
>> Great comment!!! Tx Stephanie and Ed, and Marilia!
>>
>> To Marilia's version, I added additions to paragraph 3 and a new
>> short paragraph 4 about the STI - Special Trademarks Initiative group
>> the rewrote the URS. It was the STI's recommendations and its URS
>> rules and URS limitations that the GNSO Council adopted only and
>> explicitly for New gTLDs (and with very express reasons for that
>> limitation), so I can't understand how ICANN staff can shove URS into
>> legacy gTLDs.
>>
>> Hopefully shown in "Track Changes."
>> Best,
>> Kathy
>> :
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Please find it attached with a few suggestions. I believe that we
>>> make clear that staff is acting inappropriately, so I suggested the
>>> softening of some language with regards to that.
>>>
>>> Thanks 
>>> Mar?lia
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:58 PM, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au
>>> <mailto:dave at difference.com.au>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Looks great to me. A strong statement of the problem as done
>>>     here is just what is needed.
>>>
>>>     Cheers
>>>
>>>     David
>>>
>>>     > On 21 Jun 2015, at 5:49 pm, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org
>>>     <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>> wrote:
>>>     >
>>>     > Excellent work, Ed and Stephanie!   Thank you so much for
>>>     pulling this together in time for submission.
>>>     >
>>>     > Best,
>>>     > Robin
>>>     >
>>>     > On Jun 21, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Edward Morris wrote:
>>>     >
>>>     >> Thanks Stephanie!
>>>     >>
>>>     >> More input welcome...
>>>     >>
>>>     >> Thanks,
>>>     >>
>>>     >> Ed
>>>     >>
>>>     >> Sent from my iPhone
>>>     >>
>>>     >>> On Jun 21, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Stephanie Perrin
>>>     <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> I have made a few editorial revisions...I am taking on board
>>>     the idea that this should be a strong condemnation of staff
>>>     free-wheeling, but it is pretty direct.   I like it though, and
>>>     thanks for whipping it up so quickly...one more thing, the title
>>>     should have something in there about what it is, too vague right
>>>     now....
>>>     >>> attached in markup
>>>     >>> Steph
>>>     >>>> On 2015-06-21 16:45, Edward Morris wrote:
>>>     >>>> HI all,
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> Attached find a rather rushed public comment proposed for
>>>     NCSG to submit on .travel. Please take a look, correct, make
>>>     better etc. If we're going to get something in we need to
>>>     approve it at tonight's meeting and submit before 8 p.m.
>>>     Argentina time tonight.
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> Thanks,
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> Ed
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> <draft .travel pcsp.docx>
>>>     >>
>>>     >
>>>     > _______________________________________________
>>>     > PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>     > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>     > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> *Mar?lia Maciel*
>>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV
>>> Direito Rio
>>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV
>>> Law School
>>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>>
>>> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>>> <http://www.diplomacy.edu/>
>>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>>> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the
>>> Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en 
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg