[PC-NCSG] NCPH joint Letter about GNSO review

[Stephanie Perrin]

I think that is a great statement Sam, and sums it up well.
Steph

On 2015-07-30 15:14, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> Amr, et. al.,
>
> Here are my two comments about this:
>
>   * *My view*: Given the widely shared grave reservations about the
>     methodological flaws in the GNSO review report, the GNSO
>     constituency communities should make sure that the report is not
>     used as a basis for actions based on unwarranted inferences drawn
>     from the report. However, GNSO constituency members have taken the
>     opportunity of the report to comment on issues raised, or not
>     properly raised. These can be used as a starting point for a
>     stakeholder dialogue around GNSO reform.
>
>
>   * *An NCSG PC Position:* Here is the sense of what I think we should
>     say, along with not signing the statement. None of the various
>     constituencies within NCSG are in favor of using the report as a
>     basis for action. All have reservations about both the process and
>     the content of the report. In a most favorable light the report is
>     seen as the basis for stakeholder/constituency dialogue within the
>     GNSO community. Various constituencies, and individuals within
>     those constituencies, have offered constructive comments on some
>     of the issues, and ways forward, but there is not a simple
>     consensus around endorsing a single statement, that of the CSG or
>     any other. The community awaits the commencement of a dialogue.
>
> That is my humble position.
>
> Sam
>
>
>>
>>     /On 7/30/2015 5:56 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote://
>>     ///
>>
>>         /Hi,//
>>         //There's a deadline coming up on this, and we've only heard
>>         from a handful of PC members. Could others weigh in with
>>         opinions on whether we should sign this statement along with
>>         the CSG?//
>>         //Thanks.//
>>         //Amr/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150730/4bd088d5/attachment-0001.html>