[PC-NCSG] ICANN 53 Constituency Day - Seeking Feedback for ICANN board
Edward Morris
egmorris1
Fri Jul 10 18:29:57 EEST 2015
I hope they are right. The ones I talk to seem to be headed in the other
direction. Then, again, I know of one Board member who believes the GNSO
Council should be abolished and replaced with a General Assembly. When I
asked him about minor things like weighted voting he demurs from answering.
It must be nice being a philosopher with power who doesn't bother thinking
about the details. We clearly have a lot of work to do.
----------------------------------------
From: "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:56 AM
To: "Edward Morris" <egmorris1 at toast.net>
Cc: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, "NCSG-Policy Policy
NCSG-Policy" <PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] ICANN 53 Constituency Day - Seeking Feedback for
ICANN board
Hi
On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>
wrote:
for example, the idea the Board would be open to a restructuring that
would consolidate NC interests in one unit is so far from reality that I'm
not sure how anyone could reasonably believe that.
Ok, but there are people on the board who believe that, at least with
regard to the SG.
Cheers
BD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150710/a25db540/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list