[PC-NCSG] ICANN 53 Constituency Day - Seeking Feedback for ICANN board

[Edward Morris]

I hope they are right. The ones I talk to seem to be headed in the other 
direction. Then, again, I know of one Board member who believes the GNSO 
Council should be abolished and replaced with a General Assembly. When I 
asked him about minor things like weighted voting he demurs from answering. 
It must be nice being a philosopher with power who doesn't bother thinking 
about the details. We clearly have a lot of work to do. 
  
  
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:56 AM
To: "Edward Morris" <egmorris1 at toast.net>
Cc: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, "NCSG-Policy Policy 
NCSG-Policy" <PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] ICANN 53 Constituency Day - Seeking Feedback for 
ICANN board   
 Hi
     On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> 
wrote:
    for example, the idea the Board would be open to a restructuring that 
would consolidate NC interests in one unit is so far from reality that I'm 
not sure how anyone could reasonably believe that. 

   Ok, but there are people on the board who believe that, at least with 
regard to the SG.
  
 Cheers
  
 BD


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150710/a25db540/attachment-0001.html>