[PC-NCSG] PPSAI comment last call

[Stephanie Perrin]

I am sorry, I meant I will send in my own separate set of comments, as 
an ex ewg member.  I want to call them out on some stuff that is buried 
in the EWG report, that stands to be changed in this one. Remember I was 
the victim of an ambush when they put those privacy proxy things in 
there, knowing full well a PDP would be starting soon.....
cheers SP

On 2015-07-05 17:23, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> Thanks, can you be more clear here: are you suggesting to add now 
>  those points in the draft comment?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-07-06 6:19 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>>:
>
>     Fabulous, just so you are not surprised, I am going to submit my
>     own reflections on the draft, in the context of my work on the
>     EWG.  I want to point out, in a more high level comment, that
>     1.  ICANN has no remit to look at purpose of registration
>     (commercial vs non)
>     2.  That the PP service has sprung up because data protection law
>     is not being enforced (out of scope, I know)
>     3.  That it can be priced out of existence by any of a number of
>     issues mentioned in the report
>     4.  That as the article in Domain incite points out, evidence of a
>     need for /the usefulness of  the push for more accurate data is
>     not there
>     5.  THat since the EWG report relied on the continued existence of
>     pp services to protect privacy, this is a critically important PDP
>     6.  That the inter-relatedness of the various WHOIS-related
>     exercises makes it difficult to manage policy, and change it to
>     reflect a changing Internet. Risks change over time, and the risk
>     to individual users is going up, demanding change in policy.
>     7.  I think I would like to echo the words of the guy in the
>     Domain incite article....put it on hold until the whois RDS
>     exercise is done, otherwise we risk paving the cowpath.
>     cheers SP
>
>
>     On 2015-07-05 16:36, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>     Hi everyone,
>>
>>     The comment has been edited and reviewed these last days. I don't
>>     see any objection and I think the concern raised by Ed was
>>     answered. it is time to have a last call on this and get it
>>     endorsed before the deadline in Tuesday .
>>     James is getting the signatures and will add them to the document.
>>
>>     Best Regards,
>>
>>     Rafik
>>
>>     2015-07-01 20:55 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         Hi everyone,
>>
>>         we got the comment for  Privacy/Proxy Accreditation Services
>>         Issues  report ready for review and endorsement, it is also
>>         ready to get individual signatories to give it more wieght.
>>         the deadline for submission is 7th July so we should review
>>         it within next days before that date .
>>
>>
>>         https://docs.google.com/document/d/15zxapM4tA7fOUVd7f_7Syyn-f-k4Pj-iLRcQYGKsbys/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>>         this is work done the 3 active members of the WG James, Kathy
>>         and Stephanie.  thanks for their leadership here and all
>>         their efforts to raise the concerns and awareness about the
>>         report outcome.
>>
>>
>>         Best Regards,
>>
>>
>>         Rafik
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org  <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150705/3a354404/attachment.html>