[PC-NCSG] PPSAI comment last call

[Stephanie Perrin]

Fabulous, just so you are not surprised, I am going to submit my own 
reflections on the draft, in the context of my work on the EWG.  I want 
to point out, in a more high level comment, that
1.  ICANN has no remit to look at purpose of registration (commercial vs 
non)
2.  That the PP service has sprung up because data protection law is not 
being enforced (out of scope, I know)
3.  That it can be priced out of existence by any of a number of issues 
mentioned in the report
4.  That as the article in Domain incite points out, evidence of a need 
for /the usefulness of  the push for more accurate data is not there
5.  THat since the EWG report relied on the continued existence of pp 
services to protect privacy, this is a critically important PDP
6.  That the inter-relatedness of the various WHOIS-related exercises 
makes it difficult to manage policy, and change it to reflect a changing 
Internet.  Risks change over time, and the risk to individual users is 
going up, demanding change in policy.
7.  I think I would like to echo the words of the guy in the Domain 
incite article....put it on hold until the whois RDS exercise is done, 
otherwise we risk paving the cowpath.
cheers SP

On 2015-07-05 16:36, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The comment has been edited and reviewed these last days. I don't see 
> any objection and I think the concern raised by Ed was answered. it is 
> time to have a last call on this and get it endorsed before the 
> deadline in Tuesday .
> James is getting the signatures and will add them to the document.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-07-01 20:55 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi everyone,
>
>     we got the comment for  Privacy/Proxy Accreditation Services
>     Issues  report ready for review and endorsement, it is also
>     ready to get individual signatories to give it more wieght.
>     the deadline for submission is 7th July so we should review it
>     within next days before that date .
>
>
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/15zxapM4tA7fOUVd7f_7Syyn-f-k4Pj-iLRcQYGKsbys/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>     this is work done the 3 active members of the WG James, Kathy and
>     Stephanie.  thanks for their leadership here and all their efforts
>     to raise the concerns and awareness about the report outcome.
>
>
>     Best Regards,
>
>
>     Rafik
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150705/787cb579/attachment.html>