[PC-NCSG] Open Projects

[William Drake]

> On Jan 27, 2015, at 5:00 AM, David Cake <dave at DIFFERENCE.COM.AU> wrote:
> 
>> 2. On the other hand, there is the definition of ?public interest? in the ICANN context, it?s relevance to the ICANN by-laws and the ongoing work of the accountability-CCWG, and how human rights fits into it. The discussion with Fadi in DC seemed promising to me on this, and certainly warrants some kind of follow up. I suggest that we also try to get on top of this prior to the Singapore meeting, and perhaps bring it up during the NCSG meeting with the ICANN board. If we have some solid suggestions by then, then perhaps we can propose to the board how to move forward with this. Anyone care to volunteer for this one?
> 
> 	I'm happy to volunteer for this as well. I thought the discussion at the NCPH meeting in Washington gave a really good start to this discussion. 

Me too.  I am also talking with Nora about it, as her team is responsible at the staff end.  I don?t think it?d be premature to raise this as one of our three questions to the board, building on the DC conversation and prior, and reflecting the variations in perspective.   I?d be happy to present it in the meeting if nobody else is itching to.

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150127/2d2aca69/attachment.html>