[PC-NCSG] Open Projects

Marilia Maciel mariliamaciel
Thu Jan 22 20:14:10 EET 2015


Hello,

Thanks so much for this Amr. Once you collect the info and volunteers,
where and how do you suggest we make the information available?  It would
be good to have it visible.

I volunteer to work on the public interest front. I agree with Bill that it
is more realistic to have an input and structured discussion about it in
Buenos Aires. But one thing we can do for Singapore is to have some
discussion about the relation between the public interest and human rights
in ICANN.

Is there a list where the public interest topics are being discussed? Can
someone point me?

Thanks
Mar?lia

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:59 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:53 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2. On the other hand, there is the definition of ?public interest? in the
>> ICANN context, it?s relevance to the ICANN by-laws and the ongoing work of
>> the accountability-CCWG, and how human rights fits into it. The discussion
>> with Fadi in DC seemed promising to me on this, and certainly warrants some
>> kind of follow up. I suggest that we also try to get on top of this *prior
>> to the Singapore meeting*, and perhaps bring it up during the NCSG
>> meeting with the ICANN board. If we have some solid suggestions by then,
>> then perhaps we can propose to the board how to move forward with this.
>> Anyone care to volunteer for this one?
>>
>
> Bill talked about working on paper when we have the discussion in NCSG
> list, not sure if he will do it or not.
> for topics with the board, please propose that in NCSG list in the related
> thread.
>
>
> What I talked about was starting a structured dialogue around the topic
> internally and with the larger community, including at a NCPH pre-meeting
> conference in BA, all of which could lead to some efforts to put relevant
> bits down on paper in an ordered fashion that could then inform further
> efforts etc.  This would have to be an iterative effort that takes on
> support over time (or doesn?t), methinks.
>
> These conversations could start in Singy, but I don?t see with the time
> available how we?d have something baked prior that?d be of any value.   I?m
> guessing that people will be too overwhelmed by all that?s on our plates
> already, but if someone really motivated to prove this wrong, great.
>
> Best
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>


-- 
*Mar?lia Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts

DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150122/a8ed8968/attachment-0001.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list