[PC-NCSG] NCSG-PC Work for 2015
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin
Thu Jan 22 10:23:55 EET 2015
I think all this sounds excellent. Two calls a month allows for some of
the inevitable absences which we all must have from time to time.
Advance planning is the only way, life is getting quite booked up for
all of us. Perhaps Maryem could schedule these calls soon?
cheers stephanie
On 2015-01-21 18:40, Robin Gross wrote:
> I think its a great idea to hold the two calls each month. Basically
> one 2 days before the GNSO Council Mtg and the other two weeks later.
> Having the mtgs scheduled several months in advance is one of the
> best ways to ensure participation. So we could schedule these mtgs
> now for the next 3-4 months and get them on the calendar now. It
> might also be possible to rotate the time zone at which the mtgs are
> held between the two opposite sides of the globe. So 1 call each
> month could be at a time convenient for Europe and the 2nd monthly mtg
> at a time convenient for Asia-Pacific for example. And use the same
> two time zones for 3-4 months.
>
> Thanks for getting this discussion kicked off!
>
> Best,
> Robin
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
>> Hi Amr,
>>
>> we had only 1 call as experiment and with short notice, hard to
>> evaluate in such case. in fact, I think there were some new members
>> attending the call which is encouraging. if we make the call regular
>> and predictable, I would expect more attendance. anyway, I can work
>> on preparing for the next ones e.g. Accountability, PDP for
>> newcomers etc
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2015-01-20 21:30 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A regular/monthly topic call sounds like a good idea, especially
>> if it draws interest and participation from a wider membership
>> base. However, if I recall correctly, the IANA stewardship call
>> didn?t have too many participants who were not already engaged in
>> the CWG. Still a worthwhile endeavour, I believe.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:51 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Avri,
>>>
>>> yes the idea to have a topic-call, we did one for IANA
>>> stewardship and was helpful for our comment to the CCWg
>>> proposal. I think we can an accountability call after frankfurt
>>> meeting and just before singapore
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> 2015-01-20 9:17 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Amr, glad to see you on the job.
>>>
>>> I would also like to suggest that we schedule at least one
>>> monthly call for the membership on one or another of the
>>> massive policy efforts that are going on. Rafik and I
>>> talked about doing this but never got very far. I think we
>>> did 1.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19-Jan-15 15:58, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>> Hi Amr,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for these proposal,
>>>> regarding PC meeting in Singapore, I may suggest 1 hour for
>>>> the motions (if there are some substantive) and having 1
>>>> hour for strategy/planning for this year
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-19 23:47 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I know I?ve had a really late start to kicking my new
>>>> duties off for the PC this year. This must have been a
>>>> disappointment and a pain to most of you. Been busy
>>>> these past couple of weeks, but promise to do
>>>> everything I can to make up for it over the course of
>>>> this year.
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to start off by sharing some thoughts with you
>>>> on how I see what I need to do to make the PC perform
>>>> its function more efficiently, and would be grateful
>>>> for feedback from all of you. These are my ideas on
>>>> what I should do, but I some tasks may have slipped my
>>>> mind:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Keeping a close eye on open public comment periods;
>>>> with announcements (+ reminders) to the PC list to
>>>> determine which issues are important to our membership,
>>>> and identifying who would take the lead on each open
>>>> issue. There are obviously some open issues on the
>>>> table right now, especially in the aftermath of the
>>>> NCPH intercessional in DC, that I will try to address
>>>> in separate emails.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Sync that with a schedule on getting comments
>>>> drafted and approved by the committee. I don?t see a
>>>> reason to change the current consensus building
>>>> approach we now use. Silence = consent, unless there
>>>> are thoughts to the contrary.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Following up with NCSG members in various GNSO
>>>> WGs/CWGs. This is important from a PC perspective to
>>>> prep comments when asked similar to public comment
>>>> periods. This does not mean I personally plan to update
>>>> the NCSG wiki space on ongoing PDPs, but at least make
>>>> sure there is some initiative for NCSG to submit
>>>> comments when comments are asked for by the different
>>>> working groups.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Asking councillors to take lead on prepping short
>>>> briefs of motions before council to be delivered to the
>>>> general membership prior to every monthly NCSG policy
>>>> call. I know this is more council work than it is PC
>>>> stuff, but all the councillors are on the PC. Apart
>>>> from raising awareness on various GNSO policy
>>>> recommendations amongst the NCSG membership, I?m hoping
>>>> this will also help inform councillors who are not as
>>>> up to speed on all of the motions on the meetings? agendas.
>>>>
>>>> 5. I will obviously need to help set agendas for the PC
>>>> meetings that take place at the ICANN public meetings;
>>>> the first being next month in Singapore.
>>>>
>>>> 6. I would like at least one alternate chair to pick up
>>>> the slack when/if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> Those are what I?ve come up with. Feedback from all of
>>>> you would be highly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Amr
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150122/e2e49c92/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list