[PC-NCSG] NCSG-PC Work for 2015

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Amr,

we had only 1 call as experiment and with short notice, hard to evaluate in
such case. in fact, I think there were some new members attending the call
 which is encouraging. if we make the call regular and predictable, I would
expect more attendance. anyway, I can work on  preparing for the next ones
e.g. Accountability, PDP for newcomers etc

Best Regards,

Rafik

2015-01-20 21:30 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:

> Hi,
>
> A regular/monthly topic call sounds like a good idea, especially if it
> draws interest and participation from a wider membership base. However, if
> I recall correctly, the IANA stewardship call didn?t have too many
> participants who were not already engaged in the CWG. Still a worthwhile
> endeavour, I believe.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:51 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> Hi Avri,
>
> yes the idea to have a topic-call, we did one for IANA stewardship and was
> helpful for our comment to the CCWg proposal. I think we can an
> accountability call after frankfurt meeting and just before singapore
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-01-20 9:17 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> Amr, glad to see you on the job.
>>
>> I would also like to suggest that we schedule at least one monthly call
>> for the membership on one or another of the massive policy efforts that are
>> going on.  Rafik and I talked about doing this but never got very far.  I
>> think we did 1.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 19-Jan-15 15:58, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi Amr,
>>
>>  thanks for these proposal,
>> regarding PC meeting in Singapore, I may suggest 1 hour for the motions
>> (if there are some substantive) and having 1 hour for strategy/planning for
>> this year
>>
>>  Rafik
>>
>> 2015-01-19 23:47 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>  I know I?ve had a really late start to kicking my new duties off for
>>> the PC this year. This must have been a disappointment and a pain to most
>>> of you. Been busy these past couple of weeks, but promise to do everything
>>> I can to make up for it over the course of this year.
>>>
>>>  I wanted to start off by sharing some thoughts with you on how I see
>>> what I need to do to make the PC perform its function more efficiently, and
>>> would be grateful for feedback from all of you. These are my ideas on what
>>> I should do, but I some tasks may have slipped my mind:
>>>
>>>  1. Keeping a close eye on open public comment periods; with
>>> announcements (+ reminders) to the PC list to determine which issues are
>>> important to our membership, and identifying who would take the lead on
>>> each open issue. There are obviously some open issues on the table right
>>> now, especially in the aftermath of the NCPH intercessional in DC, that I
>>> will try to address in separate emails.
>>>
>>>  2. Sync that with a schedule on getting comments drafted and approved
>>> by the committee. I don?t see a reason to change the current consensus
>>> building approach we now use. Silence = consent, unless there are thoughts
>>> to the contrary.
>>>
>>>  3. Following up with NCSG members in various GNSO WGs/CWGs. This is
>>> important from a PC perspective to prep comments when asked similar to
>>> public comment periods. This does not mean I personally plan to update the
>>> NCSG wiki space on ongoing PDPs, but at least make sure there is some
>>> initiative for NCSG to submit comments when comments are asked for by the
>>> different working groups.
>>>
>>>  4. Asking councillors to take lead on prepping short briefs of motions
>>> before council to be delivered to the general membership prior to every
>>> monthly NCSG policy call. I know this is more council work than it is PC
>>> stuff, but all the councillors are on the PC. Apart from raising awareness
>>> on various GNSO policy recommendations amongst the NCSG membership, I?m
>>> hoping this will also help inform councillors who are not as up to speed on
>>> all of the motions on the meetings? agendas.
>>>
>>>  5. I will obviously need to help set agendas for the PC meetings that
>>> take place at the ICANN public meetings; the first being next month in
>>> Singapore.
>>>
>>>  6. I would like at least one alternate chair to pick up the slack
>>> when/if necessary.
>>>
>>>  Those are what I?ve come up with. Feedback from all of you would be
>>> highly appreciated.
>>>
>>>  Thanks.
>>>
>>>  Amr
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150121/38481b4f/attachment.html>