[PC-NCSG] NCSG-PC Work for 2015

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

Thanks for all your work on the privacy front Stephanie. Isn?t the privacy list (privacy at ipjustice.org) supposed to be where discussions on privacy topics are supposed to take place? I do believe that privacy and WHOIS should always be high on our priority list, but just wondering where the work needs to be done. I don?t believe all the work on privacy from the ground-up needs to be done on the PC. We certainly will have a role, but I doubt we need to hold all the discussions here. Is there a reason I?m missing that we should?

Thanks.

Amr

On Jan 20, 2015, at 4:04 AM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I would suggest that we have a discussion on privacy topics in general, and wrap up the proposed policy paper we had going on a pad.  Folks have lost interest but we said we would comment so we should deliver.  I am busy working on it...not going to write the whole policy for them, but certainly an outline. 
> cheers Stephanie
> On 2015-01-19 19:17, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Amr, glad to see you on the job.
>> 
>> I would also like to suggest that we schedule at least one monthly call for the membership on one or another of the massive policy efforts that are going on.  Rafik and I talked about doing this but never got very far.  I think we did 1.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> On 19-Jan-15 15:58, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>> Hi Amr,
>>> 
>>> thanks for these proposal, 
>>> regarding PC meeting in Singapore, I may suggest 1 hour for the motions (if there are some substantive) and having 1 hour for strategy/planning for this year 
>>> 
>>> Rafik 
>>> 
>>> 2015-01-19 23:47 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I know I?ve had a really late start to kicking my new duties off for the PC this year. This must have been a disappointment and a pain to most of you. Been busy these past couple of weeks, but promise to do everything I can to make up for it over the course of this year.
>>> 
>>> I wanted to start off by sharing some thoughts with you on how I see what I need to do to make the PC perform its function more efficiently, and would be grateful for feedback from all of you. These are my ideas on what I should do, but I some tasks may have slipped my mind:
>>> 
>>> 1. Keeping a close eye on open public comment periods; with announcements (+ reminders) to the PC list to determine which issues are important to our membership, and identifying who would take the lead on each open issue. There are obviously some open issues on the table right now, especially in the aftermath of the NCPH intercessional in DC, that I will try to address in separate emails.
>>> 
>>> 2. Sync that with a schedule on getting comments drafted and approved by the committee. I don?t see a reason to change the current consensus building approach we now use. Silence = consent, unless there are thoughts to the contrary.
>>> 
>>> 3. Following up with NCSG members in various GNSO WGs/CWGs. This is important from a PC perspective to prep comments when asked similar to public comment periods. This does not mean I personally plan to update the NCSG wiki space on ongoing PDPs, but at least make sure there is some initiative for NCSG to submit comments when comments are asked for by the different working groups.
>>> 
>>> 4. Asking councillors to take lead on prepping short briefs of motions before council to be delivered to the general membership prior to every monthly NCSG policy call. I know this is more council work than it is PC stuff, but all the councillors are on the PC. Apart from raising awareness on various GNSO policy recommendations amongst the NCSG membership, I?m hoping this will also help inform councillors who are not as up to speed on all of the motions on the meetings? agendas.
>>> 
>>> 5. I will obviously need to help set agendas for the PC meetings that take place at the ICANN public meetings; the first being next month in Singapore.
>>> 
>>> 6. I would like at least one alternate chair to pick up the slack when/if necessary.
>>> 
>>> Those are what I?ve come up with. Feedback from all of you would be highly appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Amr
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150120/449fd04d/attachment.html>