[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG Draft Proposal - A survey regarding the CSC and MRT

[Stephanie Perrin]

Thanks, very helpful.  I was going to fill it out (I am a lurker on that 
CWG) but wanted to make sure I was not goring somebody's favorite ox.  
Good to discuss a common position.
Steph
On 2015-01-05, 8:40, Matthew Shears wrote:
> Hi - I attach a _draft_ for thought.  With some questions included.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 1/5/2015 12:56 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attached is a copy of the survey the CWG Stewardship members and 
>> participants are talking over the next 4 days.
>>
>> As the NCSG representing member, I supposed to give my best guess of 
>> a NCSG position in the answers.
>>
>> Input will be helpful.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: 	[CWG-Stewardship] CWG Draft Proposal - A survey regarding 
>>> the CSC and MRT
>>> Date: 	Sun, 4 Jan 2015 21:26:03 -0000
>>> From: 	Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>> Reply-To: 	jrobinson at afilias.info
>>> Organization: 	Afilias
>>> To: 	cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> As communicated on this Group's mailing list last week, we have 
>>> worked on and prepared a survey regarding the CSC and MRT. The 
>>> survey, is available online (*http://goo.gl/forms/qYe8wqfPIM*).
>>>
>>> Through this survey, we are very keen to hear from as many of you as 
>>> possible and therefore strongly encourage _every_ CWG member and 
>>> participant to complete the survey no later than *23:59 UTC on 
>>> Thursday, 8 January*. Note that it should be possible to complete 
>>> the survey in 15-30 minutes time.
>>>
>>> We understand that the time you have been given to respond is very 
>>> short and therefore that you may not be able to consult with any 
>>> groups that they are a part of or represent.  To the extent that 
>>> Members can reflect the views of the groups they represent, that is 
>>> desirable, but personal responses should be provided if that is not 
>>> possible.  Participants are asked to express their personal views.
>>>
>>> This survey is based on suggestions arising from the public 
>>> comments, as well as additional, related questions. The overall goal 
>>> is to get a high level sense of the views of the CWG participants 
>>> (i.e. Members and Participants) regarding these suggestions prior to 
>>> the intensive work weekend on 10-11 January. The results of the 
>>> survey will be used to guide the CWG in considering the public 
>>> comments and continuing its work toward development of a final 
>>> proposal for submission to the ICG.
>>>
>>> Please note that this is NOT a consensus poll in any shape or form.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Jonathan Robinson and Lise Fuhr
>>>
>>> Please note: Another survey is planned for a few days from now and 
>>> that will include issues related to the Independent Appeals Panel 
>>> (IAP) and Contract Co.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> -- 
> Matthew Shears
> Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> mshears at cdt.org
> + 44 771 247 2987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150105/e7ebb228/attachment.html>