[PC-NCSG] Fwd: urgent: re IANA survey

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi again,

So far we have endorsements from Sam, Ed, Klaus, Rafik and myself in addition to Matt and Stephanie who indicated their support to the responses in the AC room chat earlier today during the webinar.

Avri, I think it?s safe to say we have a rough consensus, so you can go ahead and forward the response to the CWG. I?ve attached it to this email again.

Thanks to all who responded on such short notice. For the sake of clarification, I was not aware these responses were meant to be a stakeholder group response. This was only made clear to me a couple of days ago. My understanding now is that it was initially meant to be directed towards individuals, but this somehow changed along the way as stakeholder groups and constituencies started sending in responses. In any case, I apologise for asking you all to get on top of this so suddenly.

Thanks.

Amr

PS: Please don?t forget to take a look at the input to the policy/implementation working group?s public comment response I circulated yesterday.


On Feb 26, 2015, at 6:28 PM, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org> wrote:

> Dear Amr
> 
> I endorse.
> 
> Yours
> 
> Klaus
> 
> On 2/26/2015 12:00 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This version is consistent with the one I believe Sam, Ed and I endorsed. Matt also indicated his support of it in the AC room chat of the webinar that just ended. Would be good to hear from everyone else as soon as possible in order to send it to the CWG-Stewardship at the earliest opportunity.
>> 
>> Thanks again.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>> On Feb 26, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>>> From: Amr Elsadr <ael016 at post.uit.no>
>>>> Subject: Re: urgent: re IANA survey
>>>> Date: February 26, 2015 at 5:53:07 PM GMT+1
>>>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>>> Cc: NCSG-Policy <PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> We just had a very constructive webinar in which Avri presented the latest version of the NCSG response to the questions in the IANA survey, as well as the Integrated Model she has been working on along with Matthew Shears and Brenden Kuerbis. There are policy committee members who?ve already shown support for two versions of the responses to the IANA survey. I am considering this the final version. It has already received some endorsements. Unless there is significant opposition to this going out (both on this list and the policy committee list) as the NCSG response to the survey questions, I?m going to ask Avri to send it to the CWG-Stewardship.
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to point out that we have quite a few members who are putting in a lot of time and effort into representing the NCSG on the IANA Stewardship Transition CWG and ICANN Accountability CCWG. This is sincerely appreciated, and the NCSG Policy Committee should do everything it can to support you all.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Amr
>>>> 
>>> <NCSGresponsetothenineCWGquestions.pdf>
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at YORKU.CA> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Milton,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would suggest that NCSG not only give some members "the pen" to work on documents, but assign "a gavel" to one member who can first warn of deadlines, and then pound the gavel and say "document closed and sent".
>>>>> Many of the nuances that are important don't really get carved in stone when documents are tabled and get struggled with in the ongoing processes. It is better to submit a more-or-less consensus document with a few warts to be struggled over later, than to submit no document at all.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sam L.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 26/02/2015 9:32 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> Well, the CWG meeting discussing the surveys was this morning. Early.
>>>>>> I wasn't able to attend, so maybe someone else can tell us whether we missed the boat.
>>>>>> Probably so. This is very frustrating.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150226/4e99bef7/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCSGresponsetothenineCWGquestions.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 167796 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150226/4e99bef7/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150226/4e99bef7/attachment-0003.html>