[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] [URGENT] My answers to the CWG-IANA questions
Amr Elsadr
aelsadr
Thu Feb 26 14:55:54 EET 2015
Hi again,
Sam, Stephanie, Ed, Matt and I had endorsed the comments initially provided by Milton. There have been some changes to the document since that time (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U72dVBIuwU3eq8K1e3DWstXNZLOCpcB4YFvKmqHCHQ0/edit?pli=1#). I am fine with most of them, but would prefer if this paragraph is removed from the answer to question 2:
> ICANN should separate both functions organizationally (staff) and structurally (separate budgets), kept them at arms length under an improved oversight. Oversight should be separate between an Exec Board (NomCom) and a Supervisory Board of delayed members of the SO/ACs, as per the European model proposed by Roelof Meier in the ACC group
?, and would really like this one removed (also from the answer to question 2):
> This depends on whether there can be adequate accountability mechanism that empowers the policy making body community to be involved in the decision making making process that will affect their respective functions of IANA.
I wouldn?t be able to endorse the responses if the second paragraph remained, but would appreciate guidance from the rest of the PC members.
Joy is working on consolidating the response (thanks Joy), and as indicated by Milton on the discuss-list (and confirmed to me by Avri and Brenden off-list), we have until tomorrow to submit these responses. Quick action by the policy committee is necessary at this time.
Thanks.
Amr
On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:00 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
> Thanks Sam, Stephanie and Ed.
>
> Amr
>
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:24 PM, Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I just got off a 33 hour flight (with layovers) and will endorse Milton's original comments.
>> I had some minor comments but will let them pass in the interest of time (& sleep).
>>
>> Sam
>> NPOC Policy Committee
>>
>> On 24/02/2015 11:26 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> At this point, it?d also be helpful to hear from other members of the NCSG PC. So far, only Matt and I seem to endorse Milton?s original comments. Avri has opted to abstain (@Avri: although I don?t personally feel you really need to do that).
>>>
>>> Doesn?t anyone else have an opinion?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Amr
>>
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
>> in an unjust state" -Confucius
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>> email: Lanfran at Yorku.ca Skype: slanfranco
>> blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>> Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150226/9af472e9/attachment.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list