[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] My answers to the CWG-IANA questions

[Avri Doria]

On 24-Feb-15 21:29, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Thanks for following up on this. To be clear, the answers being
> solicited by the CWG-stewardship are meant to be provided by
> stakeholder groups, and not their representative members? If that is
> the case, then the NCSG Policy Committee will need to endorse the
> responses as NCSG input to the CWG.

Originally I had thought it was addressed to any individual.  At a
certain point it became apparent that they wanted SG and Constituency
level responses.  At our Singapore meeting we discussed sending a
response - that is why i initiated the drive document and added some of
the comments that had been expressed on the list.

avri

I
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150224/040be64e/attachment-0001.html>