[PC-NCSG] NCSG comment on the CCWG-Accountability's Recommendations for Work-Stream 1

[Sam Lanfranco]

I may be too soft headed here, but I was one of those who said I thought 
there was a rough consensus here, even though I too was a bit surprised 
to see the late inclusion of #9 in the reject category.

However, I still feel that most if not all of the language used in the 
comments on those where NCSG ticked of the rejection: (a) is combined 
with reasonable suggestions for changes to the recommendations; and (b) 
uses language that does capture a rough consensus of concerns in these 
areas as they have been discussed, reflected on, and developed within 
NCSG over the past 20 or so months since the IANA Transition announcement.

On a separate issue of the adequacy of the within-NCSG consultative 
drafting process, and the last minute review of draft wording on the 
road to consensus, that scratches the surface of bigger issues. NCSG 
might devote some reflection and discussion on how we more effectively 
get the work done and observe an adequate consultative process for 
consensus, given deadlines and the time constraints many of us face 
within the comment periods.

Sam L.