[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - NEW Doodle Poll for Next Meeting

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin
Tue Aug 18 02:53:24 EEST 2015


I am forwarding to you the latest we have received on the GNSO Review.  
As you can see from the message and timeline:

  * The final report is due August 31
  * The WP has not met recently
  * The review WP has a scant 10 days to see if comments have been
    adequately reflected from the public comment period.  For many of us
    in North America, that includes the labor day holiday
  * The Board decides on final action in February

I would appreciate any input you may have on this, and will be sure to 
send the final report as soon as we see it. I am concerned about any 
potentially unfeasible or wasteful recommendations remaining in the 
final report, because in my view there was quite a lot of busy work in 
the last draft.

Kind regards,
Stephanie Perrin




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - NEW Doodle Poll for Next 
Meeting
Date: 	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:06:08 +0000
From: 	Charla Shambley <charla.shambley at icann.org>
To: 	gnso-review-dt at icann.org <gnso-review-dt at icann.org>



Dear GNSO Review WP ?

I trust this email finds you well and that you enjoyed your weekend.  We 
are having some difficulty coordinating a call during the previously 
suggested dates and times.  I have set up a new doodle poll 
<http://doodle.com/ugtkh3g3tm3vp4pr> so that the Review Working Party 
can begin discussions on implementation.  I will close the doodle poll 
<http://doodle.com/ugtkh3g3tm3vp4pr> at the close of business on 26 August.

Also, I am including an updated timeline below which reflects key dates 
and milestones through the time of Board approval of the Final Report in 
February 2016.

As always, feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Charla

*From:*Charla Shambley
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 10:08 AM
*To:* gnso-review-dt at icann.org
*Subject:* GNSO Review - Doodle Poll for Next Meeting

Dear GNSO Review WP --

By now you should have received a cancellation for the call tomorrow 
from the GNSO Secretariat.   Per Jen's email below, I have set up a 
doodle poll so that we can schedule our next call in September to begin 
the discussion on implementation.  I will close the doodle poll by COB 
Tuesday, 4 August.

Also, just a reminder that we do have the wiki 
<https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Initial+Assessment+of+Recommendations> 
set up to capture your comments and initial assessment of the 
recommendations in the Draft Report 
<https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Draft+Report+of+the+Independent+Examiner>.  
Your input into the feasibility and usefulness of each of the 
recommendations will be helpful during our next call.

For those of you on holiday in August, enjoy!

Regards,

Charla

Charla K. Shambley

Strategic Initiatives Program Manager

ICANN

12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300

Los Angeles, CA  90094

310-578-8921

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org 
<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:00 AM
To: Novoa, Osvaldo; Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de 
<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>
Cc: gnso-review-dt at icann.org <mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org>; Larisa 
B. Gurnick
Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting

Thank you to everyone who has responded.  Based upon the responses, I 
think we only have 3 people (including me) who can attend the call this 
Thursday, 30 July.  If anyone else can attend, please let me know, but 
I'm concerned that without more attending the call, we will have to 
repeat much of the conversation when others can join and want to ensure 
we have sufficient feedback to move this initiative forward before the 
October Dublin meeting.  Chuck and Osvlado, I so appreciate your 
availability, but also deeply respect your time and don't want you to 
feel like it is not productive because there are not enough groups 
represented on the call.

I'd like to suggest we move this call to September when everyone will be 
back from August holiday and public comments will be completed and we 
could start to work on feedback towards implementation with more 
participation. I'm completely happy to still get on a call on Thursday 
if you all think that is going to be worthwhile, but also happy to send 
out a new  Doodle poll to try to get more participation.

Please let me know your comments and thoughts and we can plan 
accordingly.  Thanks so much.  For all of you heading on holiday - have 
a great one!

Jen

JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB

FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM

513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348

IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 What will you do with 
your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel 
on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column 
http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands 
http://ow.ly/EbloM

-----Original Message-----

From: Novoa, Osvaldo [mailto:onovoa at Antel.com.uy]

Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:35 PM

To: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de <mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>

Cc: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe at wolfedomain.com <mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com>>; 
gnso-review-dt at icann.org <mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org>

Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting

I am available for the 30th of July.

Best regards,

Osvaldo

Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 24/7/2015, a las 22:26, 
"Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de> 
<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de%3cmailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de%3e>" 
<Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de 
<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de%3cmailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>>> 
escribi?:

Thanks Jen,

I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to 
Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative.

Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe 
<jwolfe at wolfedomain.com<mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com 
<mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com%3cmailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com>>>:

Hello GNSO Review Working Team:

Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process.  
As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some 
concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public 
comments.  I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can 
accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so 
that any groups or individual who wish to comment  have one more week to 
respond.  I appreciate those groups who have completed their public 
comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide 
comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in 
order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August.

I have summarized the comments received to date below:

Comments to date:

?             Brand Registry Group has submitted a 
comment<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00000.html> 
on 16 July

?             Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a 
comment<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00001.html> 
on 23 July

?             In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all 
expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July.  There may 
be others, but staff is not currently aware of this.

?             64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - 
see 
posted<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> 
table

Public Comment/Engagement:

This Public 
Comment<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-review-draft-2015-06-01-en> 
period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 
53 days.

?         During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for 
the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public 
session<https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-aoc-org-reviews> 
on Reviews.

?         A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have 
been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the 
posted<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> 
table.

As one additional point:  we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday 
to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the 
SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation.  
I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to 
use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on 
implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more 
advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received.

I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle 
poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled.

Thanks again for your continued support of this process!  Have a great 
weekend!

Jen

jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB

Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm

513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348

IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with 
your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel 
on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column 
http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands 
http://ow.ly/EbloM

________________________________

El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido 
?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede 
ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor 
notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine 
inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su 
sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este 
e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas 
destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con 
respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo 
nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n

This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely 
for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform 
the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as 
the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any 
person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. 
ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without 
respecting our Information Security Policy.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150817/5ba224f8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 31673 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150817/5ba224f8/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Review Timeline Updated 7 Aug 2015.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 207444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150817/5ba224f8/attachment-0001.pdf>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list