[PC-NCSG] [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we all have time for

[William Drake]

Hi

Yes, to be discussed again at the next NCPH meeting.

Best

Bill

> On Aug 14, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> can I understand we got a rough consensus here about the response to send to CSG: agreeing about their proposal for this year only, discussing about alternation for next years and working to let them commit to that. also I will ask them to discuss more in NCPH list .
> 
> for next long term process for VC election, we will conduct consultation within NCSG membership, managed by PC.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 2015-08-12 18:17 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
> Hi,
> 
> On Aug 12, 2015 6:05 PM, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > That sounds good to me. Lets get the ball rolling on this year?s election of a VC, but make clear to Steve and the CSG that we still need to talk more about how the rotations would work. I hope we can start on that sooner rather than later.
> 
> That is the goal, getting a clear answer to CSG 
> >
> > May I also ask a question? Is there a reason why we?re not using the NCPH leadership list to hold this conversation?
> >
> I asked several time that we conduct discussions there but the list sounds dead for now (while they get the proposal from the message Avri sent to that list)
> 
> > And one last point?, after we agree to proceed with this year?s election, our agreement to a formal process should be provisional, and only finalised after we hold a discussion about it on NCSG-DISCUSS. Our members really do need to be made aware that we are working these issues out with our NCPH counterparts.
> 
> Yes that is the goal to document better the processes and keep records. For NCSG list, yes sure but I hope the PC will take the lead to do so and conduct the consultation. Maybe some work on how to conduct consultation about positions on more systematic manner.
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
> >
> > > On Aug 12, 2015, at 3:42 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM <mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
> > >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > > lets focus here on the priority task: agreeing in the answer to CWG about the proposal. can I understand we can accept the amendment and acknowledge the concerns raised by Avri. the proposal is for this year, after that we will have to discuss about rotation proposal and how we need to keep their commitments, maybe by including the ombudsman in the process.
> > >
> > > for the chair election, it will be good to break the what is becoming a tradition to have a chair from CPH, but we should agree first on what we see as a good chair. we can discuss that later.
> > > I should answer Steve soon about our position.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Rafik
> > >
> > > 2015-08-12 0:51 GMT+09:00 William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > So Tony?s a no, but appreciates the interest.  Plans to kick back more.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Voila yes, except of course that would tie up one of our best guys right when we are losing Avri....leaving us newbies running the ranch (yeah yeah I know, I cannot keep calling myself a newbie...)
> > >> SP
> > >> Perennially new (or is that Perrinially new??)
> > >> On 2015-08-11 4:41, William Drake wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net <mailto:egmorris1 at toast.net>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That said, Amr is someone who would be acceptable to more than a few CSG and CPH members.
> > >>>
> > >>> If so then voila, no?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> > > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> > > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg>
> >
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150814/14d4f781/attachment.html>