[PC-NCSG] [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we all have time for

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi everyone,

can I understand we got a rough consensus here about the response to send
to CSG: agreeing about their proposal for this year only, discussing about
alternation for next years and working to let them commit to that. also I
will ask them to discuss more in NCPH list .

for next long term process for VC election, we will conduct consultation
within NCSG membership, managed by PC.

Best,

Rafik

2015-08-12 18:17 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> On Aug 12, 2015 6:05 PM, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > That sounds good to me. Lets get the ball rolling on this year?s
> election of a VC, but make clear to Steve and the CSG that we still need to
> talk more about how the rotations would work. I hope we can start on that
> sooner rather than later.
>
> That is the goal, getting a clear answer to CSG
> >
> > May I also ask a question? Is there a reason why we?re not using the
> NCPH leadership list to hold this conversation?
> >
> I asked several time that we conduct discussions there but the list sounds
> dead for now (while they get the proposal from the message Avri sent to
> that list)
>
> > And one last point?, after we agree to proceed with this year?s
> election, our agreement to a formal process should be provisional, and only
> finalised after we hold a discussion about it on NCSG-DISCUSS. Our members
> really do need to be made aware that we are working these issues out with
> our NCPH counterparts.
>
> Yes that is the goal to document better the processes and keep records.
> For NCSG list, yes sure but I hope the PC will take the lead to do so and
> conduct the consultation. Maybe some work on how to conduct consultation
> about positions on more systematic manner.
>
> Rafik
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
> >
> > > On Aug 12, 2015, at 3:42 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > > lets focus here on the priority task: agreeing in the answer to CWG
> about the proposal. can I understand we can accept the amendment and
> acknowledge the concerns raised by Avri. the proposal is for this year,
> after that we will have to discuss about rotation proposal and how we need
> to keep their commitments, maybe by including the ombudsman in the process.
> > >
> > > for the chair election, it will be good to break the what is becoming
> a tradition to have a chair from CPH, but we should agree first on what we
> see as a good chair. we can discuss that later.
> > > I should answer Steve soon about our position.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Rafik
> > >
> > > 2015-08-12 0:51 GMT+09:00 William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > So Tony?s a no, but appreciates the interest.  Plans to kick back more.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Voila yes, except of course that would tie up one of our best guys
> right when we are losing Avri....leaving us newbies running the ranch (yeah
> yeah I know, I cannot keep calling myself a newbie...)
> > >> SP
> > >> Perennially new (or is that Perrinially new??)
> > >> On 2015-08-11 4:41, William Drake wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That said, Amr is someone who would be acceptable to more than a
> few CSG and CPH members.
> > >>>
> > >>> If so then voila, no?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150814/93ee04a9/attachment.html>