[PC-NCSG] [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we all have time for

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

That sounds good to me. Lets get the ball rolling on this year?s election of a VC, but make clear to Steve and the CSG that we still need to talk more about how the rotations would work. I hope we can start on that sooner rather than later.

May I also ask a question? Is there a reason why we?re not using the NCPH leadership list to hold this conversation?

And one last point?, after we agree to proceed with this year?s election, our agreement to a formal process should be provisional, and only finalised after we hold a discussion about it on NCSG-DISCUSS. Our members really do need to be made aware that we are working these issues out with our NCPH counterparts.

Thanks.

Amr

> On Aug 12, 2015, at 3:42 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> 
>  Hi,
> 
> lets focus here on the priority task: agreeing in the answer to CWG about the proposal. can I understand we can accept the amendment and acknowledge the concerns raised by Avri. the proposal is for this year, after that we will have to discuss about rotation proposal and how we need to keep their commitments, maybe by including the ombudsman in the process.
> 
> for the chair election, it will be good to break the what is becoming a tradition to have a chair from CPH, but we should agree first on what we see as a good chair. we can discuss that later.
> I should answer Steve soon about our position.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> 2015-08-12 0:51 GMT+09:00 William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>:
> Hi
> 
> So Tony?s a no, but appreciates the interest.  Plans to kick back more.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> Voila yes, except of course that would tie up one of our best guys right when we are losing Avri....leaving us newbies running the ranch (yeah yeah I know, I cannot keep calling myself a newbie...)
>> SP
>> Perennially new (or is that Perrinially new??)
>> On 2015-08-11 4:41, William Drake wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> That said, Amr is someone who would be acceptable to more than a few CSG and CPH members.
>>> 
>>> If so then voila, no?
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg