[PC-NCSG] [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we all have time for

[Rafik Dammak]

 Hi,

lets focus here on the priority task: agreeing in the answer to CWG about
the proposal. can I understand we can accept the amendment and acknowledge
the concerns raised by Avri. the proposal is for this year, after that we
will have to discuss about rotation proposal and how we need to keep their
commitments, maybe by including the ombudsman in the process.

for the chair election, it will be good to break the what is becoming a
tradition to have a chair from CPH, but we should agree first on what we
see as a good chair. we can discuss that later.
I should answer Steve soon about our position.

Best,

Rafik

2015-08-12 0:51 GMT+09:00 William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>:

> Hi
>
> So Tony?s a no, but appreciates the interest.  Plans to kick back more.
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
> Voila yes, except of course that would tie up one of our best guys right
> when we are losing Avri....leaving us newbies running the ranch (yeah yeah
> I know, I cannot keep calling myself a newbie...)
> SP
> Perennially new (or is that Perrinially new??)
> On 2015-08-11 4:41, William Drake wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:
>
> That said, Amr is someone who would be acceptable to more than a few CSG
> and CPH members.
>
>
> If so then voila, no?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150812/95741484/attachment.html>