[PC-NCSG] resending the GNSO documents

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

Transiting in Oslo right now, but wanted to offer some thoughts.

I'm not sure we necessarily need the permission of the submitter of any comment in the comment forum to voice support for it. However, the way it's shaping up, we seem to have too equal a number of supporters/objectors, or at least cause to discuss this further (which is a luxury we may not necessarily have). 

Unless there is a clear overwhelming support expressed by the members of the PC to support the statements, I believe it would be wrong to claim that the NCSG endorses them. 

Thanks. 

Amr

Sent from mobile

> On Aug 2, 2015, at 11:26 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just got home.
> 
> 
>> On 02-Aug-15 06:55, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> 1. Ed objecting to endorsement of his own statement by the NCSG PC
> 
> if Ed doesn't want his submission endorsed, that seems to be a gating
> factor.
>> 
>> 2. Klaus objecting to endorsement of comments on this topic by the NCSG PC (in the absence of a broader discussion with NCSG membership).
> 
> If Klaus is voting against endorsement, unless there is other NPOC voice
> in favor I would say endorsement is a dead issue.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg